Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30863406›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2019

Antibody Specific B-Cell Epitope Predictions: Leveraging Information From Antibody-Antigen Protein Complexes.

Martin Closter Jespersen, Swapnil Mahajan, Bjoern Peters, Morten Nielsen, Paolo Marcatili

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Improving B-cell epitope prediction.Drug discovery today · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Surface displayed porcine epidemic diarrhea virus membrane epitopes onJournal of animal science and technology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Interactions Between the Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  18. Computational prediction of multiple antigen epitopes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  19. Computational detection of antigen-specific B cell receptors following immunization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin Closter JespersenDepartment of Bio and Health Informatics, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Swapnil MahajanLa Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, Center for Infectious Disease, Allergy and Asthma Research, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Bjoern PetersLa Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, Center for Infectious Disease, Allergy and Asthma Research, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Morten NielsenDepartment of Bio and Health Informatics, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Paolo MarcatiliDepartment of Bio and Health Informatics, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
La Jolla Institute for Immunology · USTechnical University of Denmark · DKNational University of General San Martín · AR

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201200010C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B-cells can neutralize pathogenic molecules by targeting them with extreme specificity using receptors secreted or expressed on their surface (antibodies). This is achieved via molecular interactions between the paratope (i.e., the antibody residues involved in the binding) and the interacting region (epitope) of its target molecule (antigen). Discerning the rules that define this specificity would have profound implications for our understanding of humoral immunogenicity and its applications. The aim of this work is to produce improved, antibody-specific epitope predictions by exploiting features derived from the antigens and their cognate antibodies structures, and combining them using statistical and machine learning algorithms. We have identified several geometric and physicochemical features that are correlated in interacting paratopes and epitopes, used them to develop a Monte Carlo algorithm to generate putative epitopes-paratope pairs, and train a machine-learning model to score them. We show that, by including the structural and physicochemical properties of the paratope, we improve the prediction of the target of a given B-cell receptor. Moreover, we demonstrate a gain in predictive power both in terms of identifying the cognate antigen target for a given antibody and the antibody target for a given antigen, exceeding the results of other available tools.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodiesAntibody SpecificityAntigen-Antibody ComplexBinding Sites, AntibodyEpitope MappingEpitopes, B-LymphocyteHumansModels, MolecularMonte Carlo MethodNeural Networks, ComputerProtein DomainsReproducibility of ResultsAntibodiesAntigen-Antibody ComplexEpitopes, B-Lymphocyteantibodyantibody specific epitope predictionantigenB cell epitopeparatopeprediction

Identifiers

PMID30863406
PMCPMC6399414
OpenAlexW2917097596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.