Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30863403›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2019

Harnessing CD8

Joanna A Warren, Genevieve Clutton, Nilu Goonetilleke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. State of the Field: Cytotoxic Immune Cell Responses inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. CD8Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dominant CD4Cell reports. Medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Transcriptome-based measurement of CD8Trends in immunology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joanna A WarrenDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Genevieve CluttonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Nilu GoonetillekeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

Funding

Phase I therapeutic testing of viral-vectored vaccines that shift CD8+ T cell immunodominance to conserved regions of HIV-1U01AI131310 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GOONETILLEKE, NILU · 2017 to 2023
$7.2M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI131310NIH HHS 1R24AG044325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has transformed HIV from a fatal disease to a chronic condition. In recent years there has been considerable interest in strategies to enable HIV-infected individuals to cease ART without viral rebound, either by purging all cells infected harboring replication-competent virus (HIV eradication), or by boosting immune responses to allow durable suppression of virus without rebound (HIV remission). Both of these approaches may need to harness HIV-specific CD8

Indexed as

Anti-Retroviral AgentsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHIV-1HIV InfectionsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansViral LoadViremiaVirus ActivationVirus ReplicationAnti-Retroviral Agentsagingantiretroviral therapy (ART)CD8 T cellHIVHIV cure strategiesimmunosenescencevaccines

Identifiers

PMID30863403
PMCPMC6400228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.