ArticlePatient preference and adherence2019
Mode of injection and treatment adherence: results of a survey characterizing the perspectives of health care providers and US women 18-45 years old.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analyzing the impact of subcutaneous injection needle, device, and administration characteristics on patient pain, anxiety, and safety: a systematic literature review.Drug delivery · 2026Pooled it
- Patient preferences for prophylactic regimens requiring regular injections in children and adolescents: a systematic review and thematic analysis.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Patient and Healthcare Professional Preferences for Characteristics of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Agents for the Treatment of Schizophrenia.Advances in therapy · 2023Trial
- Subcutaneous Injection Site Pain of Formulation Matrices.Pharmaceutical research · 2021Trial
- Effect of Vibration Anesthesia on Injection-Related Pain: A Prospective Crossover Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Clinical Benefit and Risk Profile of TV-46000 for Patients with Schizophrenia as Assessed by Number Needed to Treat and Number Needed to Harm.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
- Assessing the Value of Omalizumab for Pediatric Asthma in China: A Multicriteria Decision Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effect of Allele-Specific Clcn7Calcified tissue international · 2024Article
- Disease-Agnostic Electronic Adherence Aid for Subcutaneous at-Home and Self-Administration Devices-The Lowest Common Denominator Based on a Cross-Indication Survey.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
- High Usability and Applicability Ratings for the New SmartClicRheumatology and therapy · 2023Article
- RNA therapeutics in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States.Rheumatology and therapy · 2021Article
- Newly formulated GROWJECTClinical pediatric endocrinology : case reports and clinical investigations : official journal of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology · 2021Article
- Patient Reported Ease-of-Use with a Disposable Autoinjector in Individuals with Migraine.Patient preference and adherence · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA market research study was conducted to characterize perceptions of intramuscular (IM) and subcutaneous (SC) routes of injection, including use of autoinjectors, and how these perceptions affect adherence to injection regimens. The perspectives were from women of childbearing age (18-45 years old; consumers) and health care providers (HCPs) involved in women's health care.
methodsTwo telephone surveys, one of HCPs and the other of consumers, were conducted by KRC Research (New York, NY, USA) between May and July 2017. HCPs were recruited across the US; the consumer survey was administered to a nationally representative sample. Survey questions identified potential challenges of IM and SC administration, their impact on treatment adherence, and perceptions of autoinjectors. Results are reported using descriptive statistics and reflect an unweighted sample; margin of error is ±3% for the consumer survey.
resultsHCP respondents included 100 generalist OB/GYNs, 101 maternal-fetal medicine specialists, and 519 nurses; there were 1,012 female consumer respondents. Nurses reported more experience than physicians in administering injections, including with autoinjectors. Consumers reported having received treatments via both IM and SC injections; 26% had received treatment with injections at regular intervals. Most HCPs (58%) said they preferred to administer SC injections, which was also the preference for receiving injections among consumers, who reported needle size as a concern regardless of administration mode. Other major concerns were perceptions of pain and fear/anxiety, and seeing the needle, all of which were greater for IM than for SC injections. HCPs and consumers both reported greater likelihood of adherence to therapy administered SC using an autoinjector because they believe that this method provides substantial HCP and patient benefits.
conclusionHCPs and consumers identified similar challenges with adherence to injections. However, there was consistently higher preference for SC relative to IM. HCPs and consumers believe that autoinjectors may increase adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.