Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30863011›Full record

SynthesisDrug design, development and therapy2019

Comparisons between ticagrelor and clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Zhong-Guo Fan, Wen-Ling Zhang, Bing Xu, Jun Ji, Nai-Liang Tian, Sheng-Hu He

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug design, development and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhong-Guo FanDepartment of Cardiology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, yzhshys@163.com.
Wen-Ling ZhangDepartment of Geriatric Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Bing XuDepartment of Cardiology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, yzhshys@163.com.
Jun JiDepartment of Cardiology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, yzhshys@163.com.
Nai-Liang TianDepartment of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Heart Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, tiannailiang@163.com.
Sheng-Hu HeDepartment of Cardiology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, yzhshys@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy and safety of ticagrelor following percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with acute coronary syndrome remains unclear. This study sought to evaluate clinical outcomes of ticagrelor as part of dual-antiplatelet treatment for these patients.

methodsPubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and other Internet sources were searched for eligible citations. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, consisting of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. The secondary end point was the occurrence of definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST). The risk of bleeding was chosen to be the safety end point.

resultsEleven clinical trials - six randomized trials and five observational trials - were finally analyzed. A tendency toward reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was observed only with respect to ticagrelor (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.66-1.03;

conclusionAs part of dual-antiplatelet treatment following percutaneous coronary intervention, ticagrelor significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death and ST in acute coronary syndrome patients, but at the cost of bleeding. More powerful relevant randomized trials are still warranted to guide clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAcute Coronary SyndromeClopidogrelHumansObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTicagrelorClopidogrelTicagreloracute coronary syndromeclopidogreldual antiplatelet treatmentpercutaneous coronary interventionticagrelor

Identifiers

PMID30863011
PMCPMC6388955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.