Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30862957›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Nuclear lamina integrity is required for proper spatial organization of chromatin in Drosophila.

Sergey V Ulianov, Semen A Doronin, Ekaterina E Khrameeva, Pavel I Kos, Artem V Luzhin, Sergei S Starikov, Aleksandra A Galitsyna, Valentina V Nenasheva, Artem A Ilyin, Ilya M Flyamer and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Telomere Checkpoint in Development and Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sergey V UlianovInstitute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119334, Russia. sergey.v.ulyanov@gmail.com.
Semen A DoroninInstitute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 123182, Russia.
Ekaterina E KhrameevaSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, 143026, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6188-9139
Pavel I KosFaculty of Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Artem V LuzhinInstitute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119334, Russia.
Sergei S StarikovFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Aleksandra A GalitsynaInstitute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119334, Russia.
Valentina V NenashevaInstitute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 123182, Russia.
Artem A IlyinInstitute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 123182, Russia.
Ilya M FlyamerMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Elena A MikhalevaInstitute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 123182, Russia.
Mariya D LogachevaSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, 143026, Russia.
Mikhail S GelfandSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, 143026, Russia.
Alexander V ChertovichFaculty of Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Alexey A GavrilovInstitute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119334, Russia.
Sergey V RazinInstitute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119334, Russia.
Yuri Y ShevelyovInstitute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 123182, Russia. shevelev@img.ras.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How the nuclear lamina (NL) impacts on global chromatin architecture is poorly understood. Here, we show that NL disruption in Drosophila S2 cells leads to chromatin compaction and repositioning from the nuclear envelope. This increases the chromatin density in a fraction of topologically-associating domains (TADs) enriched in active chromatin and enhances interactions between active and inactive chromatin. Importantly, upon NL disruption the NL-associated TADs become more acetylated at histone H3 and less compact, while background transcription is derepressed. Two-colour FISH confirms that a TAD becomes less compact following its release from the NL. Finally, polymer simulations show that chromatin binding to the NL can per se compact attached TADs. Collectively, our findings demonstrate a dual function of the NL in shaping the 3D genome. Attachment of TADs to the NL makes them more condensed but decreases the overall chromatin density in the nucleus by stretching interphase chromosomes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyChromosomes, InsectDown-RegulationDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression ProfilingGenes, InsectHistonesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceModels, AnimalNuclear LaminaUp-RegulationChromatinHistones

Identifiers

PMID30862957
PMCPMC6414625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.