Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30862937›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2020

Towards precision medicine for stress disorders: diagnostic biomarkers and targeted drugs.

H Le-Niculescu, K Roseberry, D F Levey, J Rogers, K Kosary, S Prabha, T Jones, S Judd, M A McCormick, A R Wessel and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dimensions of trauma: The relationship between daytime PTSD cluster symptomology and sleep measures.Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

H Le-NiculescuDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
K RoseberryDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
D F LeveyDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J RogersDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
K KosaryDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
S PrabhaDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
T JonesIndianapolis VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
S JuddDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
M A McCormickDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
A R WesselDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
A WilliamsIndianapolis VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
P L PhalenDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4219-3475
F MamdaniDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
A SequeiraDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
S M KurianDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
A B NiculescuDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. anicules@iupui.edu.
Indiana University School of MedicineRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Developing Blood Tests for Mood DisordersDP2OD007363 · OD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI NICULESCU, ALEXANDER B · 2010 to 2010
$2.3M
Metallothioneins and polyamines in major depression and suicideR01MH097082 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SEQUEIRA, ADOLFO · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
Mood State Blood Biomarkers: A Discovery-Based ApproachI01CX000139 · VA · RLR VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI NICULESCU, ALEXANDER B · 2009 to 2017
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000139NIH HHS DP2 OD007363NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097082U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs) 2I01CX000139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological fingerprint of environmental adversity may be key to understanding health and disease, as it encompasses the damage induced as well as the compensatory reactions of the organism. Metabolic and hormonal changes may be an informative but incomplete window into the underlying biology. We endeavored to identify objective blood gene expression biomarkers for psychological stress, a subjective sensation with biological roots. To quantify the stress perception at a particular moment in time, we used a simple visual analog scale for life stress in psychiatric patients, a high-risk group. Then, using a stepwise discovery, prioritization, validation, and testing in independent cohort design, we were successful in identifying gene expression biomarkers that were predictive of high-stress states and of future psychiatric hospitalizations related to stress, more so when personalized by gender and diagnosis. One of the top biomarkers that survived discovery, prioritization, validation, and testing was FKBP5, a well-known gene involved in stress response, which serves as a de facto reassuring positive control. We also compared our biomarker findings with telomere length (TL), another well-established biological marker of psychological stress and show that newly identified predictive biomarkers such as NUB1, APOL3, MAD1L1, or NKTR are comparable or better state or trait predictors of stress than TL or FKBP5. Over half of the top predictive biomarkers for stress also had prior evidence of involvement in suicide, and the majority of them had evidence in other psychiatric disorders, providing a molecular underpinning for the effects of stress in those disorders. Some of the biomarkers are targets of existing drugs, of potential utility in patient stratification, and pharmacogenomics approaches. Based on our studies and analyses, the biomarkers with the best overall convergent functional evidence (CFE) for involvement in stress were FKBP5, DDX6, B2M, LAIR1, RTN4, and NUB1. Moreover, the biomarker gene expression signatures yielded leads for possible new drug candidates and natural compounds upon bioinformatics drug repurposing analyses, such as calcium folinate and betulin. Our work may lead to improved diagnosis and treatment for stress disorders such as PTSD, that result in decreased quality of life and adverse outcomes, including addictions, violence, and suicide.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdultbeta 2-MicroglobulinBiomarkersDEAD-box RNA HelicasesFemaleGene ExpressionHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyNogo ProteinsPrecision MedicinePredictive Value of TestsProto-Oncogene ProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingB2M protein, humanbeta 2-MicroglobulinBiomarkersDDX6 protein, humanDEAD-box RNA Helicasesleukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor 1Nogo ProteinsNUB1 protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsReceptors, ImmunologicRTN4 protein, humanTacrolimus Binding Protein 5Tacrolimus Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30862937
PMCPMC7192849
OpenAlexW2921381997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.