ArticleScientific reports2019
Effects of the high-inequality of income on the breast cancer mortality in Brazil.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Census tract-level socioeconomic variables and breast cancer characteristics and outcomes in California and New York State.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Article
- Physician distribution and income-inequality on lung cancer mortality in Brazil.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Impact of income inequality on breast cancer mortality according to socioeconomic status in the Federative Units of Brazil.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Relationship between income inequality, socioeconomic development, vulnerability index, and maternal mortality in Brazil, 2017.BMC public health · 2021Article
- A multilevel assessment of the social determinants associated with the late stage diagnosis of breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Observational
- Temporal changes in breast cancer screening coverage provided under the Brazilian National Health Service between 2008 and 2017.BMC public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As well as breast cancer mortality, the income inequality in Brazil is different between Federative units, including between units of the same region. To assess the effects of the high-inequality of income on breast cancer mortality in Brazilian Federative Units, in the 2010 year. This is an ecologic study. Deaths from breast cancer in Brazilian women according to Federative units were obtained from the Department of Informatics of the Unified Health System. Mortality by breast cancer was estimated per 100,000 women and age-standardized by the direct method according to World Health Organization population. Income inequality was measured by the Gini index obtained from the United Nations Development Programme. The High-inequality of income was classified by the third tercile of the distribution from the Gini index of the Federative units. Univariate analysis was performed according to data normality. Linear regressions were performed by the stepwise backward method. The confidence level was 5%. Stata® (Stata Corp, LC) 11.0. was used. The High-inequality of income was associated with worse social and demographic indicators. The age-standardized breast cancer mortality was larger in the high-inequality of income Federative units. In the adjusted analysis, these Federative units presented a mean of 2 more deaths (ranging from the 0.4 to 3.7 deaths, r² = 0.79; p = 0.018) by breast cancer per 100,000 women when compared to the Federative units without high-inequality of income. In the Brazilian Federative units, the high-inequality of income was associated with age-standardized breast cancer mortality more.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.