Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30862851›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Characterization of the rumen and fecal microbiome in bloated and non-bloated cattle grazing alfalfa pastures and subjected to bloat prevention strategies.

E Azad, H Derakhshani, R J Forster, R J Gruninger, S Acharya, T A McAllister, E Khafipour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. First Steps into Ruminal Microbiota Robustness.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ADDAGMA: A database for domestic animal gut microbiome atlas.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E AzadDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
H DerakhshaniDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
R J ForsterAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Center, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
R J GruningerAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Center, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
S AcharyaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Center, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
T A McAllisterDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. Tim.McAllister@canada.ca.
E KhafipourDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. Ehsan.Khafipour@gmail.com.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frothy bloat is an often fatal digestive disorder of cattle grazing alfalfa pastures. The aim of this study was to investigate ruminal and fecal microbiota dynamics associated with development of alfalfa-induced frothy bloat and to further explore how bloat prevention strategies influence the composition of these microbial communities. In a 3 × 3 crossover experiment, twelve rumen-cannulated steers were sequentially subjected to: (1) pure alfalfa pasture, (2) pure alfalfa pasture supplemented with the pluronic detergent ALFASURE, and (3) alfalfa - sainfoin mixed pasture. Eleven out of 12 steers in pure alfalfa pasture developed clinical bloat, whereas ALFASURE treatment prevented the development of bloat in all 12 steers and alfalfa - sainfoin prevented bloat in 5 out of 11 steers. Development of bloat was associated with considerable shifts in the microbiota profile of rumen contents. In particular, the microbiota of solid rumen contents from bloated steers contained higher species richness and diversity. Streptococcus, Succinivibrio and unclassified Myxococcales were enriched in the rumen microbiota of bloated steers, whereas Fibrobacter and Ruminococcus were overrepresented in the rumen contents of non-bloated steers. Our results provide novel insights into bloat-associated shifts in the composition and predicted functional properties of the rumen microbiota of cattle grazing alfalfa pasture.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBacteriaCattleCattle DiseasesDietary FiberFecesFermentationFlatulenceGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLigninMedicago sativaRumenDietary FiberLigninlignocellulose

Identifiers

PMID30862851
PMCPMC6414552
OpenAlexW2922410163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.