Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30862845›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Developing attentional control in naturalistic dynamic road crossing situations.

Victoria I Nicholls, Geraldine Jean-Charles, Junpeng Lao, Peter de Lissa, Roberto Caldara, Sebastien Miellet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Victoria I NichollsBournemouth University, Faculty of Science & Technology, Bournemouth, BH12 1PH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2612-3071
Geraldine Jean-CharlesUniversity of Fribourg, Department of Psychology, iBM lab, Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland.
Junpeng LaoUniversity of Fribourg, Department of Psychology, iBM lab, Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6029-7510
Peter de LissaUniversity of Fribourg, Department of Psychology, iBM lab, Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland.
Roberto CaldaraUniversity of Fribourg, Department of Psychology, iBM lab, Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland.
Sebastien MielletUniversity of Wollongong, School of Psychology, ActiveVision lab, Wollongong, 2522, Australia. smiellet@uow.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3519-033X
University of Fribourg · CHBournemouth University · GBUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last 20 years, there has been increasing interest in studying visual attentional processes under more natural conditions. In the present study, we propose to determine the critical age at which children show similar to adult performance and attentional control in a visually guided task; in a naturalistic dynamic and socially relevant context: road crossing. We monitored visual exploration and crossing decisions in adults and children aged between 5 and 15 while they watched road traffic videos containing a range of traffic densities with or without pedestrians. 5-10 year old (y/o) children showed less systematic gaze patterns. More specifically, adults and 11-15 y/o children look mainly at the vehicles' appearing point, which is an optimal location to sample diagnostic information for the task. In contrast, 5-10 y/os look more at socially relevant stimuli and attend to moving vehicles further down the trajectory when the traffic density is high. Critically, 5-10 y/o children also make an increased number of crossing decisions compared to 11-15 y/os and adults. Our findings reveal a critical shift around 10 y/o in attentional control and crossing decisions in a road crossing task.

Indexed as

PedestriansAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsAttentionChildChild, PreschoolDecision MakingEye MovementsFixation, OcularHumansPhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30862845
PMCPMC6414534
OpenAlexW2922205252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.