Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30862638›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Capturing the experience of the hospital-stay journey from admission to discharge using diaries completed by patients in their own words: a qualitative study.

Craig S Webster, Tanisha Jowsey, Lucy M Lu, Marcus A Henning, Antonia Verstappen, Andy Wearn, Papaarangi M Reid, Alan F Merry, Jennifer M Weller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Introducing physician associates to hospital patients: Development and feasibility testing of a patient experience-based intervention.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Craig S WebsterCentre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6997-4263
Tanisha JowseyCentre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Lucy M LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Marcus A HenningCentre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Antonia VerstappenCentre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Andy WearnMedical Programme Directorate, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Papaarangi M ReidTe Kupenga Hauora Māori, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Alan F MerryDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jennifer M WellerCentre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo capture and better understand patients' experience during their healthcare journey from hospital admission to discharge, and to identify patient suggestions for improvement.

designProspective, exploratory, qualitative study. Patients were asked to complete an unstructured written diary expressed in their own words, recording negative and positive experiences or anything else they considered noteworthy. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingPatients undergoing vascular surgery in a metropolitan hospital. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Complete diary transcripts underwent a general inductive thematic analysis, and opportunities to improve the experience of care were identified and collated.

resultsWe recruited 113 patients in order to collect 80 completed diaries from 78 participants (a participant response rate of 69%), recording patients' experiences of their hospital-stay journey. Participating patients were a median (range) age of 69 (21-99) years and diaries contained a median (range) of 197 (26-1672) words each. Study participants with a tertiary education wrote more in their diaries than those without-a median (range) of 353.5 (48-1672) vs 163 (26-1599) words, respectively (Mann-Whitney U test, p=0.001). Three primary and eight secondary themes emerged from analysis of diary transcripts-primary themes being: (1) communication as central to care; (2) importance of feeling cared for and (3) environmental factors shaping experiences. In the great majority, participants reported positive experiences on the hospital ward. However, a set of 12 patient suggestions for improvement were identified, the majority of which could be addressed with little cost but result in substantial improvements in patient experience. Half of the 12 suggestions for improvement fell into primary theme 1, concerning opportunities to improve communication between healthcare providers and patients.

conclusionsUnstructured diaries completed in a patient's own words appear to be an effective and simple approach to capture the hospital-stay experience from the patient's own perspective, and to identify opportunities for improvement.

Indexed as

Vascular Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overConvalescenceDiaries as TopicFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePatient DischargePatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesQualitative Researchhospital wardpatient centred healthcarepatient diarypatient experiencepatient voicequality and safety

Identifiers

PMID30862638
PMCPMC6429883
OpenAlexW2922051171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.