Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30862637›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

The COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial: a phase III randomised controlled clinical trial for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

E Shelley Hwang, Terry Hyslop, Thomas Lynch, Elizabeth Frank, Donna Pinto, Desiree Basila, Deborah Collyar, Antonia Bennett, Celia Kaplan, Shoshana Rosenberg and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02926911 (Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 157 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02926911 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy (COMET) Trial For Low Risk DCIS: A Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlliance Foundation Trials, LLC.Ran2017 to 2030Enrolled997ConditionsDCIS, Ductal Carcinoma in SituArmsSurgery, Active Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 304 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Surgical management of breast cancer: a review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

E Shelley HwangDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Terry HyslopDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Thomas LynchDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Elizabeth FrankPatient Leadership Team, COMET Study.
Donna PintoPatient Leadership Team, COMET Study.
Desiree BasilaPatient Leadership Team, COMET Study.
Deborah CollyarPatient Leadership Team, COMET Study.
Antonia BennettDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Celia KaplanDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Shoshana RosenbergDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alastair ThompsonDepartment of Breast Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Anna WeissAlliance Foundation Trials, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ann PartridgeDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Centre for the Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tectonics · GBDuke University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USAlliance Foundation Trials · USBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David Darr · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN N. NORTON · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Ian Michael Carroll · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuctal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive non-obligate precursor of invasive breast cancer. With guideline concordant care (GCC), DCIS outcomes are at least as favourable as some other early stage cancer types such as prostate cancer, for which active surveillance (AS) is a standard of care option. However, AS has not yet been tested in relation to DCIS. The goal of the COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial for low-risk DCIS is to gather evidence to help future patients consider the range of treatment choices for low-risk DCIS, from standard therapies to AS. The trial will determine whether there may be some women who do not substantially benefit from current GCC and who could thus be safely managed with AS. This protocol is version 5 (11 July 2018). Any future protocol amendments will be submitted to Quorum Centralised Institutional Review Board/local institutional review boards for approval via the sponsor of the study (Alliance Foundation Trials). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: COMET is a phase III, randomised controlled clinical trial for patients with low-risk DCIS. The primary outcome is ipsilateral invasive breast cancer rate in women undergoing GCC compared with AS. Secondary objectives will be to compare surgical, oncological and patient-reported outcomes. Patients randomised to the GCC group will undergo surgery as well as radiotherapy when appropriate; those in the AS group will be monitored closely with surgery only on identification of invasive breast cancer. Patients in both the GCC and AS groups will have the option of endocrine therapy. The total planned accrual goal is 1200 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The COMET trial will be subject to biannual formal review at the Alliance Foundation Data Safety Monitoring Board meetings. Interim analyses for futility/safety will be completed annually, with reporting following Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines for non-inferiority trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02926911; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma in SituMastectomyWatchful WaitingClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient Outcome AssessmentRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk Assessmentactive surveillancebreast cancerclinical trialductal carcinoma in situnon-invasivesurgery

Identifiers

PMID30862637
PMCPMC6429899
OpenAlexW2921149595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.