Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3086258›Full record

ArticleThe Histochemical journal1986

Increased acidophilia of eosinophil granules after EDTA treatment.

C Gomez-Perretta, R Armas-Portela, J C Stockert, A Tato, J M Ferrer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Histochemical journal, 1986. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C Gomez-Perretta
R Armas-Portela
J C Stockert
A Tato
J M Ferrer
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESUniversitat de València · ESLeitat Technological Center · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acidophilic reaction of eosinophil leucocyte granules from human, pig and horse blood smears was investigated by using May-Grünwald-Giemsa staining after previous treatment with EDTA and sodium citrate solutions. The same peak at 530 nm, but absorption values considerably higher than those of controls, were found in eosinophil granules after application of chelating agents, indicating that removal of metal cations could unmask basic groups in these structures.

Indexed as

Azure StainsEdetic AcidPhenothiazinesAnimalsCytophotometryCytoplasmic GranulesEosinophilsHorsesHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationSwineAzure StainsEdetic AcidPhenothiazines

Identifiers

PMID3086258
OpenAlexW2054962662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.