Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30862551›Full record

ReviewActa biomaterialia2019

Intra-articular targeting of nanomaterials for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Shannon Brown, Shreedevi Kumar, Blanka Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Synthesis, characterisation, andFrontiers in drug delivery · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shannon BrownUniversity of Florida, J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, United States.
Shreedevi KumarUniversity of Florida, J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, United States.
Blanka SharmaUniversity of Florida, J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, United States. Electronic address: blanka.sharma@bme.ufl.edu.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
Nanoparticle targeting within the joint for site-specific delivery of osteoarthritis therapeuticsR01AR071335 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SHARMA, BLANKA · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR071335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis is a prevalent and debilitating disease that involves pathological contributions from numerous joint tissues and cells. The joint is a challenging arena for drug delivery, since the joint has poor bioavailability for systemically administered drugs and experiences rapid clearance of therapeutics after intra-articular injection. Moreover, each tissue within the joint presents unique barriers to drug localization. In this review, the various applications of nanotechnology to overcome these drug delivery limitations are investigated. Nanomaterials have reliably shown improvements to retention profiles of drugs within the joint space relative to injected free drugs. Additionally, nanomaterials have been modified through active and passive targeting strategies to facilitate interactions with and localization within specific joint tissues such as cartilage and synovium. Last, the limitations of drawing cross-study comparisons, the implications of synovial fluid, and the potential importance of multi-modal therapeutic strategies are discussed. As emerging, cell-specific disease modifying osteoarthritis drugs continue to be developed, the need for targeted nanomaterial delivery will likely become critical for effective clinical translation of therapeutics for osteoarthritis. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Improving drug delivery to the joint is a pressing clinical need. Over 27 million Americans live with osteoarthritis, and this figure is continuously expanding. Numerous drugs have been investigated but have failed in clinical trials, likely related to poor bioavailability to target cells. This article comprehensively reviews the advances in nano-scale delivery vehicles designed to overcome the delivery barriers in the joint. This is the first review to analyze active and passive targeting strategies systematically for different target sites while also delineating between tissue homing and whole joint retention. By bringing together the lessons learned across numerous nano-scale platforms, researchers may be able to hone future nanomaterial designs, allowing emerging therapeutics to perform with clinically relevant efficacy and disease modifying potential.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiological TransportCartilage, ArticularDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug Delivery SystemsDrug LiberationHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularLipidsNanostructuresOsteoarthritisPeptidesPolymersProteinsSynovial FluidBiocompatible MaterialsDelayed-Action PreparationsLipidsPeptidesPolymersProteinsCartilageDrug deliveryIntra-articularJoint retentionNanomaterialsNanoparticlesOsteoarthritisSynoviumTissue targeting

Identifiers

PMID30862551
PMCPMC6615949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.