ArticleJournal of biomechanics2019
Computational modeling of neuromuscular response to swing-phase robotic knee extension assistance in cerebral palsy.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modelling the interaction between wearable assistive devices and digital human models-A systematic review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Pooled it
- A machine learning approach to quantify individual gait responses to ankle exoskeletons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting subject-specific responses to exoskeleton assistance may aid in maximizing functional gait outcomes, such as achieving full knee-extension at foot contact in individuals with crouch gait from cerebral palsy (CP). The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of volitional and non-volitional muscle activity in subject-specific responses to knee extension assistance during walking with an exoskeleton. We developed a simulation framework to predict responses to exoskeleton torque by applying a stretch-reflex spasticity model with muscle excitations computed during unassisted walking. The framework was validated with data collected from six individuals with CP. Framework-predicted knee angle at terminal swing was within 4 ± 4° (mean ± sd) of the knee angle measured experimentally without the addition of spasticity. Kinematic responses in two-thirds of the participants could be accurately modeled using only underlying muscle activity and the applied exoskeleton torque; incorporating hamstring spasticity was necessary to recreate the measured kinematics to within 1 ± 1° in the remaining participants. We observed strong positive linear relationships between knee extension and exoskeleton assistance, and strong negative quadratic relationships between knee extension and spasticity. We utilized our framework to identify optimal torque profiles necessary to achieve full knee-extension at foot contact. An angular impulse of 0.061 ± 0.025 Nm·s·kg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.