Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30862149›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2019

Long-term monitoring of Graves’ disease in children and adolescents: a single-center experience

Selma Tunç, Özge Köprülü, Hatice Ortaç, Özlem Nalbantoğlu, Ceyhun Dizdarer, Korcan Demir, Behzat Özkan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Graves’ disease (GD) is more severe, requires a more complex treatment, and has a lower probability of achieving remission in children than in adults. There is no consensus on the appropriate duration of antithyroid drug (ATD) treatment. Surgical or radioactive iodine (RAI) treatments are not definitive and generally result in permanent hypothyroidism. This study’s goal was examining the effectiveness of ATD treatment in children and adolescents with GD and determining the risk factors of remission and relapse. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 45 patients (36 females and 9 males, median age 12.5 years) aged 4–18 who were diagnosed with GD between 2003 and 2017. All patients initially were treated with an ATD. ATD treatment was discontinued at a mean of 23.2 ± 13.2 months (10–37 months). Results: Patients were classified into remission (n = 24) and relapse groups (n = 21). The duration of initial ATD treatment in the remission group was longer (26.91 ± 5.17 months) than in the relapse group (19.09 ± 7.14 months) (P = 0.01). The total ATD treatment duration was statistically longer in the remission group (42.14 ± 14.35 months) than in the relapse group (26.95 ± 16.13 months) (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Long-term initial ATD treatment and long-term total ATD treatment were evaluated as positive parameters for the remission of Graves’ disease in children and adolescents. Our findings showed that the chance of long-term remission increases in direct proportion to the initial ATD treatment duration and the total ATD treatment duration.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntithyroid AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraves DiseaseHumansIodine RadioisotopesMaleRecurrenceRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntithyroid AgentsIodine Radioisotopesantithyroid drugsGraves’ diseasehyperthyroidism

Identifiers

PMID30862149
PMCPMC7018247
OpenAlexW2921001422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.