Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30862123›Full record

ReviewBiology2019

The Mammalian Circadian Timing System and the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus as Its Pacemaker.

Michael H Hastings, Elizabeth S Maywood, Marco Brancaccio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Integrating Astrocytes in the Sleep-Wake Cycle: The Time Is Now.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael H HastingsMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Division of Neurobiology, CB2 0QH Cambridge, UK. mha@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.
Elizabeth S MaywoodMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Division of Neurobiology, CB2 0QH Cambridge, UK. emaywood@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.
Marco BrancaccioUK Dementia Research Institute at Imperial College London, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, W12 0NN London, UK. m.brancaccio@imperial.ac.uk.
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUK Dementia Research Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105170643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past twenty years have witnessed the most remarkable breakthroughs in our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms that underpin circadian (approximately one day) time-keeping. Across model organisms in diverse taxa: cyanobacteria (

Indexed as

astrocytesBmal1clockcryptochromeentrainmentperiodphotoperiodsleepsuprachiasmatic

Identifiers

PMID30862123
PMCPMC6466121
OpenAlexW2920938142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.