ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2019
Reconciling the concepts and measures of diversity, rarity and originality in ecology and evolution.
Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Patterns and Drivers of Climatic Niche Originality and Overlap: Disentangling Ecological From Methodological Signals.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Functional distinctiveness and rarity highlight climate vulnerability of mountain birds.Ecology · 2026Article
- Naturalized and Invasive Species Integrate Differently in the Trait Space of Local Plant Communities.Ecology letters · 2025Article
- Integrating hotspot dynamics and centers of diversity: a review of Indo-Australian Archipelago biogeographic evolution and conservation.Marine life science & technology · 2025Article
- A complete and dynamic tree of birds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Ecological dynamics of moa extinctions reveal convergent refugia that today harbour flightless birds.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Article
- Explaining demographic-destination preferences for cultural ecosystem services: A set-theoretic configurational analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Road crossings change functional diversity and trait composition of stream-dwelling macroinvertebrate assemblages.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Response of Common and Rare Beetle Species to Tree Species and Vertical Stratification in a Floodplain Forest.Insects · 2022Article
- Diversity and host assemblage of avian haemosporidians in different terrestrial ecoregions of Peru.Current zoology · 2022Article
- Large herbivores facilitate the persistence of rare taxa under tundra warming.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Tsallis generalized entropy enhances the interpretation of transcriptomics datasets.PloS one · 2022Article
- Construction of Environmental Synthetic Microbial Consortia: Based on Engineering and Ecological Principles.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Rarity facets of biodiversity: Integrating Zeta diversity and Dark diversity to understand the nature of commonness and rarity.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Climate and land-use changes drive biodiversity turnover in arthropod assemblages over 150 years.Nature ecology & evolution · 2021Article
- Rebound in functional distinctiveness following warming and reduced fishing in the North Sea.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Response of benthic invertebrate assemblages to seasonal and habitat condition in the Wewe River, Ashanti region (Ghana).Open life sciences · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of biological diversity, or biodiversity, is at the core of evolutionary and ecological studies. Many indices of biodiversity have been developed in the last four decades, with species being one of the central units of these indices. However, evolutionary and ecological studies need a precise description of species' characteristics to best quantify inter-species diversity, as species are not equivalent and exchangeable. One of the first concepts characterizing species in biodiversity studies was abundance-based rarity. Abundance-based rarity was then complemented by trait- and phylo-based rarity, called species' trait-based and phylogenetic originalities, respectively. Originality, which is a property of an individual species, represents a species' contribution to the overall diversity of a reference set of species. Originality can also be defined as the rarity of a species' characteristics such as the state of a functional trait, which is often assumed to be represented by the position of the species on a phylogenetic tree. We review and compare various approaches for measuring originality, rarity and diversity and demonstrate that (i) even if attempts to bridge these concepts do exist, only a few ecological and evolutionary studies have tried to combine them all in the past two decades; (ii) phylo- and trait-based diversity indices can be written as a function of species rarity and originality measures in several ways; and (iii) there is a need for the joint use of these three types of indices to understand community assembly processes and species' roles in ecosystem functioning in order to protect biodiversity efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.