ArticleJournal of anatomy2019
Morphology, shape variation and movement of skeletal elements in starfish (Asterias rubens).
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stress-correlated stereom organization in the echinoid tubercle reveals hierarchical mechanical integration.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
- Marine Invertebrate-Inspired Thermal Management: Functional Materials, Structural Architectures, and Integrated Systems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A starfish-inspired 4D self-healing morphing structure.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Morphological and Physiological Aspects of Mutable Collagenous Tissue at the Autotomy Plane of the StarfishMarine drugs · 2023Review
- Placing human gene families into their evolutionary context.Human genomics · 2022Review
- Exploring the macrostructural anatomy of dendrochirotid sea cucumber's (Echinodermata) calcareous rings under micro-computed tomography and its bearing on phylogeny.Journal of anatomy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Starfish (order: Asteroidea) possess a complex endoskeleton composed of thousands of calcareous ossicles. These ossicles are embedded in a body wall mostly consisting of a complex collagen fiber array. The combination of soft and hard tissue provides a challenge for detailed morphological and histological studies. As a consequence, very little is known about the general biomechanics of echinoderm endoskeletons and the possible role of ossicle shape in enabling or limiting skeletal movements. In this study, we used high-resolution X-ray microscopy to investigate individual ossicle shape in unprecedented detail. Our results show the variation of ossicle shape within ossicles of marginal, reticular and carinal type. Based on these results we propose an additional classification to categorize ossicles not only by shape but also by function into 'connecting' and 'node' ossicles. We also used soft tissue staining with phosphotungstic acid successfully and were able to visualize the ossicle ultrastructure at 2-μm resolution. We also identified two new joint types in the aboral skeleton (groove-on-groove joint) and between adambulacral ossicles (ball-and-socket joint). To demonstrate the possibilities of micro-computed tomographic methods in analyzing the biomechanics of echinoderm skeletons we exemplarily quantified changes in ossicle orientation for a bent ray for ambulacral ossicles. This study provides a first step for future biomechanical studies focusing on the interaction of ossicles and soft tissues during ray movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.