ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2019
Modeling heart failure in animal models for novel drug discovery and development.
Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardioprotective and Antioxidant Effects of Marine-DerivedPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular, Kidney, Liver, and Metabolic Interactions in Heart Failure: Breaking Down Silos.Circulation research · 2025Review
- Biomimetic Approaches in the Development of Optimised 3D Culture Environments for Drug Discovery in Cardiac Disease.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Preventive and Therapeutic Effects of Crocetin in Rats with Heart Failure.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Experimental heart failure models in small animals.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- Arrhythmogenic and antiarrhythmic actions of late sustained sodium current in the adult human heart.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Considerations to Model Heart Disease in Women with Preeclampsia and Cardiovascular Disease.Cells · 2021Review
- Strategies for targeting the cardiac sarcomere: avenues for novel drug discovery.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWhen investigating drugs that treat heart diseases, it is critical when choosing an animal model for the said model to produce data that is translatable to the human patient population, while keeping in mind the principles of reduction, refinement, and replacement of the animal model in the research. Areas covered: In this review, the authors focus on mammalian models developed to study the impact of drug treatments on human heart failure. Furthermore, the authors address human patient variability and animal model invariability as well as the considerations that need to be made regarding choice of species. Finally, the authors discuss some of the most common models for the two most prominent human heart failure etiologies; increased load on the heart and myocardial ischemia. Expert opinion: In the authors' opinion, the data generated by drug studies is often heavily impacted by the choice of species and the physiologically relevant conditions under which the data are collected. Approaches that use multiple models and are not restricted to small rodents but involve some verification on larger mammals or on human myocardium, are needed to advance drug discovery for the very large patient population that suffers from heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.