Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30861098›Full record

Trial reportCancer2019

Association between body mass index and response to duloxetine for aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal symptoms in SWOG S1202.

N Lynn Henry, Joseph M Unger, Cathee Till, Anne F Schott, Katherine D Crew, Danika L Lew, Michael J Fisch, Carol M Moinpour, James L Wade, Dawn L Hershman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

N Lynn HenryDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0002-4771-5930
Joseph M UngerSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington.
Cathee TillSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington.
Anne F SchottDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Katherine D CrewDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Danika L LewSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington.
Michael J FischAIM Specialty Health, Chicago, Illinois.
Carol M MoinpourCancer Prevention Program, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
James L WadeHeartland National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Decatur, Illinois.
Dawn L HershmanDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZAColumbia University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USHeartland Cancer Research · USIllinois Department of Public Health · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
UM LAPs -UG1 GrantUG1CA233160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ANNE F SCHOTT · 2019 to 2026
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAromatase inhibitor (AI)-associated musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS) negatively impact adherence to and persistence with therapy. In SWOG S1202, patients with AIMSS who were treated with duloxetine, a serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, reported improvement in pain by 12 weeks compared with placebo. Based on the authors' prior observation that responses to pain interventions differ between obese and nonobese patients, the current study examined whether response to duloxetine therapy differed by obesity status.

methodsIn SWOG S1202, a total of 299 AI-treated postmenopausal women with stage I to III (AJCC 7th Edition) breast cancer who developed new or worsening average pain were enrolled, randomized to duloxetine or placebo, and treated for 12 weeks. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained at baseline and through 12 weeks. Patients were categorized into nonobese (body mass index [BMI] <30 kg/m

resultsIn approximately 54% of evaluable patients with a BMI ≥30 kg/m

conclusionsIn this trial, obese patients with AIMSS obtained more analgesic benefit from duloxetine compared with nonobese patients. Additional studies are warranted to determine the biologic basis for these findings.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexObesityAgedBreast NeoplasmsDuloxetine HydrochlorideFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesPainPrognosisSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake InhibitorsDuloxetine HydrochlorideSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitorsarthralgiasbreast cancerduloxetineobesityplacebo

Identifiers

PMID30861098
PMCPMC6675412
OpenAlexW2920889997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.