Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30861061›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Fosfomycin for Injection (ZTI-01) Versus Piperacillin-tazobactam for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection Including Acute Pyelonephritis: ZEUS, A Phase 2/3 Randomized Trial.

Keith S Kaye, Louis B Rice, Aaron L Dane, Viktor Stus, Olexiy Sagan, Elena Fedosiuk, Anita F Das, David Skarinsky, Paul B Eckburg, Evelyn J Ellis-Grosse

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02753946 (Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ZTI-01 vs Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Treatment of cUTI/AP Infection in Hospitalized Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02753946 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ZTI-01 vs Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Treatment of cUTI/AP Infection in Hospitalized Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorNabriva Therapeutics AGRan2016 to 2017Enrolled465ConditionsUrinary Tract Infection Symptomatic, Acute Pyelonephritis, Urinary Tract Infection ComplicatedArmsZTI-01, Piperacillin-tazobactam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Keith S KayeDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Louis B RiceDepartment of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital and The Miriam Hospital, Providence.
Aaron L DaneDaneStat Consulting, Alderly Edge, United Kingdom.
Viktor StusMunicipal Institution Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Dnipro.
Olexiy SaganMunicipal Institution Zaporizhzhia Regional Clinical Hospital of Zaporizhzhia, Regional Council Department of Urology, State Institution Zaporizhzhia Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education under the Ministry of Health of Ukraine.
Elena FedosiukBrest Regional Hospital, Belarus.
Anita F DasDas Statistical Consulting, Guerneville.
David SkarinskyZavante Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California.
Paul B EckburgZavante Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California.
Evelyn J Ellis-GrosseZavante Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California.
Ministry of Health · UAMiriam Hospital · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USWest County Health Centers · USZaporizhzhia Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Ministry of Health of Ukraine · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZTI-01 (fosfomycin for injection) is an epoxide antibiotic with a differentiated mechanism of action (MOA) inhibiting an early step in bacterial cell wall synthesis. ZTI-01 has broad in vitro spectrum of activity, including multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, and is being developed for treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) and acute pyelonephritis (AP) in the United States.

methodsHospitalized adults with suspected or microbiologically confirmed cUTI/AP were randomized 1:1 to 6 g ZTI-01 q8h or 4.5 g intravenous (IV) piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZ) q8h for a fixed 7-day course (no oral switch); patients with concomitant bacteremia could receive up to 14 days.

resultsOf 465 randomized patients, 233 and 231 were treated with ZTI-01 and PIP-TAZ, respectively. In the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (m-MITT) population, ZTI-01 met the primary objective of noninferiority compared with PIP-TAZ with overall success rates of 64.7% (119/184 patients) vs 54.5% (97/178 patients), respectively; treatment difference was 10.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.4, 20.8). Clinical cure rates at test of cure (TOC, day 19-21) were high and similar between treatments (90.8% [167/184] vs 91.6% [163/178], respectively). In post hoc analysis using unique pathogens typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, overall success rates at TOC in m-MITT were 69.0% (127/184) for ZTI-01 versus 57.3% (102/178) for PIP-TAZ (difference 11.7% 95% CI: 1.3, 22.1). ZTI-01 was well tolerated. Most treatment-emergent adverse events, including hypokalemia and elevated serum aminotransferases, were mild and transient.

conclusionsZTI-01 was effective for treatment of cUTI including AP and offers a new IV therapeutic option with a differentiated MOA for patients with serious Gram-negative infections. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT02753946.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial LoadDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleFosfomycinHumansInjectionsMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationPyelonephritisTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsFosfomycinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combinationacute pyelonephritiscomplicated urinary tract infectionfosfomycinZTI-01

Identifiers

PMID30861061
PMCPMC6880332
OpenAlexW2922183800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.