Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30861023›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Multisensory guided associative learning in healthy humans.

Gabriella Eördegh, Attila Őze, Balázs Bodosi, András Puszta, Ákos Pertich, Anett Rosu, György Godó, Attila Nagy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabriella EördeghDepartment of Operative and Esthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3707-3583
Attila ŐzeDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Balázs BodosiDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
András PusztaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Ákos PertichDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Anett RosuDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
György GodóCsongrád County Health Care Center, Psychiatric Outpatient Care, Hódmezővásárhely, Hungary.
Attila NagyDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
University of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Associative learning is a basic cognitive function by which discrete and often different percepts are linked together. The Rutgers Acquired Equivalence Test investigates a specific kind of associative learning, visually guided equivalence learning. The test consists of an acquisition (pair learning) and a test (rule transfer) phase, which are associated primarily with the function of the basal ganglia and the hippocampi, respectively. Earlier studies described that both fundamentally-involved brain structures in the visual associative learning, the basal ganglia and the hippocampi, receive not only visual but also multisensory information. However, no study has investigated whether there is a priority for multisensory guided equivalence learning compared to unimodal ones. Thus we had no data about the modality-dependence or independence of the equivalence learning. In the present study, we have therefore introduced the auditory- and multisensory (audiovisual)-guided equivalence learning paradigms and investigated the performance of 151 healthy volunteers in the visual as well as in the auditory and multisensory paradigms. Our results indicated that visual, auditory and multisensory guided associative learning is similarly effective in healthy humans, which suggest that the acquisition phase is fairly independent from the modality of the stimuli. On the other hand, in the test phase, where participants were presented with acquisitions that were learned earlier and associations that were until then not seen or heard but predictable, the multisensory stimuli elicited the best performance. The test phase, especially its generalization part, seems to be a harder cognitive task, where the multisensory information processing could improve the performance of the participants.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAgedAssociation LearningAuditory PerceptionBasal GangliaFemaleHealthy VolunteersHippocampusHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30861023
PMCPMC6413907
OpenAlexW2921294734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.