ArticlePloS one2019
Multisensory guided associative learning in healthy humans.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Facilitation and interference effects of the multisensory context on learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychological research · 2023Pooled it
- Semantic Content of Visual Consequent Stimuli Modulates Audiovisual Learning in Migraine.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Semantic content of visual stimuli has a greater impact on associative equivalence learning than stimulus modality.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Combined Effect of Visual Stimulus Complexity and Semantic Content on Audiovisual Associative Equivalence Learning.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Simplified Visual Stimuli Impair Retrieval and Transfer in Audiovisual Equivalence Learning Tasks.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- The Visual Advantage Effect in Comparing Uni-Modal and Cross-Modal Probabilistic Category Learning.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Article
- Suboptimal multisensory processing in pediatric migraine without aura: a comparative, cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Visual consequent stimulus complexity affects performance in audiovisual associative learning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Multisensory stimuli enhance the effectiveness of equivalence learning in healthy children and adolescents.PloS one · 2022Article
- Overcoming Pavlovian bias in semantic space.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Maintained Visual-, Auditory-, and Multisensory-Guided Associative Learning Functions in Children With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Predicting Stimulus Modality and Working Memory Load During Visual- and Audiovisual-Acquired Equivalence Learning.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Associative learning is a basic cognitive function by which discrete and often different percepts are linked together. The Rutgers Acquired Equivalence Test investigates a specific kind of associative learning, visually guided equivalence learning. The test consists of an acquisition (pair learning) and a test (rule transfer) phase, which are associated primarily with the function of the basal ganglia and the hippocampi, respectively. Earlier studies described that both fundamentally-involved brain structures in the visual associative learning, the basal ganglia and the hippocampi, receive not only visual but also multisensory information. However, no study has investigated whether there is a priority for multisensory guided equivalence learning compared to unimodal ones. Thus we had no data about the modality-dependence or independence of the equivalence learning. In the present study, we have therefore introduced the auditory- and multisensory (audiovisual)-guided equivalence learning paradigms and investigated the performance of 151 healthy volunteers in the visual as well as in the auditory and multisensory paradigms. Our results indicated that visual, auditory and multisensory guided associative learning is similarly effective in healthy humans, which suggest that the acquisition phase is fairly independent from the modality of the stimuli. On the other hand, in the test phase, where participants were presented with acquisitions that were learned earlier and associations that were until then not seen or heard but predictable, the multisensory stimuli elicited the best performance. The test phase, especially its generalization part, seems to be a harder cognitive task, where the multisensory information processing could improve the performance of the participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.