Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30861002›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Effects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells.

O A Utheim, L Pasovic, S Raeder, J R Eidet, I G Fostad, A Sehic, B Roald, M F de la Paz, T Lyberg, D A Dartt and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

O A UtheimDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0097-4070
L PasovicDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
S RaederNorwegian Dry Eye Clinic, Oslo, Norway.
J R EidetDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
I G FostadDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
A SehicDepartment of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
B RoaldInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
M F de la PazInstitut Universitari Barraquer, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
T LybergDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
D A DarttSchepens Eye Research Institute/Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
T P UtheimDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTransplantation of limbal stem cells is a promising therapy for limbal stem cell deficiency. Limbal cells can be harvested from either a healthy part of the patient's eye or the eye of a donor. Small explants are less likely to inflict injury to the donor site. We investigated the effects of limbal explant size on multiple characteristics known to be important for transplant function.

methodsHuman limbal epithelial cells were expanded from large versus small explants (3 versus 1 mm of the corneal circumference) for 3 weeks and characterized by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy. Epithelial thickness, stratification, outgrowth, ultrastructure and phenotype were assessed.

resultsEpithelial thickness and stratification were similar between the groups. Outgrowth size correlated positively with explant size (r = 0.37; P = 0.01), whereas fold growth correlated negatively with explant size (r = -0.55; P < 0.0001). Percentage of cells expressing the limbal epithelial cell marker K19 was higher in cells derived from large explants (99.1±1.2%) compared to cells derived from small explants (93.2±13.6%, P = 0.024). The percentage of cells expressing ABCG2, integrin β1, p63, and p63α that are markers suggestive of an immature phenotype; Keratin 3, Connexin 43, and E-Cadherin that are markers of differentiation; and Ki67 and PCNA that indicate cell proliferation were equal in both groups. Desmosome and hemidesmosome densities were equal between the groups.

conclusionFor donor- and culture conditions used in the present study, large explants are preferable to small in terms of outgrowth area. As regards limbal epithelial cell thickness, stratification, mechanical strength, and the attainment of a predominantly immature phenotype, both large and small explants are sufficient.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationEpithelial CellsEpithelium, CornealLimbus CorneaeStem CellsAntigens, DifferentiationCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedFemaleHumansMaleAntigens, Differentiation

Identifiers

PMID30861002
PMCPMC6413940
OpenAlexW2921143232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.