Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30860989›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2019

Hotspots of human impact on threatened terrestrial vertebrates.

James R Allan, James E M Watson, Moreno Di Marco, Christopher J O'Bryan, Hugh P Possingham, Scott C Atkinson, Oscar Venter

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Uncovering correlates of decline and critical refuges for a threatened terrestrial mammal.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Evaluating protected areas' coverage of threats to terrestrial biodiversity.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The importance of Indigenous Peoples' lands for the conservation of terrestrial mammals.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Combined effects of land use and hunting on distributions of tropical mammals.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James R AllanSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6322-0172
James E M WatsonSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Moreno Di MarcoSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8902-4193
Christopher J O'BryanSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6472-6957
Hugh P PossinghamCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Scott C AtkinsonCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5995-0199
Oscar VenterNatural Resource and Environmental Studies Institute, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conserving threatened species requires identifying where across their range they are being impacted by threats, yet this remains unresolved across most of Earth. Here, we present a global analysis of cumulative human impacts on threatened species by using a spatial framework that jointly considers the co-occurrence of eight threatening processes and the distribution of 5,457 terrestrial vertebrates. We show that impacts to species are widespread, occurring across 84% of Earth's surface, and identify hotspots of impacted species richness and coolspots of unimpacted species richness. Almost one-quarter of assessed species are impacted across >90% of their distribution, and approximately 7% are impacted across their entire range. These results foreshadow localised extirpations and potential extinctions without conservation action. The spatial framework developed here offers a tool for defining strategies to directly mitigate the threats driving species' declines, providing essential information for future national and global conservation agendas.

Indexed as

VertebratesAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesExtinction, BiologicalHumans

Identifiers

PMID30860989
PMCPMC6413901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.