Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30860489›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Characterizing Media Content and Effects of Organ Donation on a Social Media Platform: Content Analysis.

Xiaoya Jiang, Wenshi Jiang, Jiawei Cai, Qingdong Su, Zhigang Zhou, Lingnan He, Kaisheng Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. What Are the Characteristics of User Texts and Behaviors in Chinese Depression Posts?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoya JiangSchool of Communication and Design, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5903-4019
Wenshi JiangIntelligence Sharing for Life Science Research Institute, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7451-917X
Jiawei CaiIntelligence Sharing for Life Science Research Institute, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6007-3015
Qingdong Su923 Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Nanning, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4085-2729
Zhigang ZhouThe First People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5330-7821
Lingnan HeSchool of Communication and Design, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6679-7487
Kaisheng LaiSchool of Journalism and Communication, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2035-9275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lack of organ donors has become a barrier for the development of organ transplantation programs, and many countries are currently facing a severe shortage of deceased organs. Media campaigns on social media have the potential to promote organ donation. However, little is known about what kind of media content is the most appropriate for this purpose.

objectiveThis study aimed to analyze media posts regarding organ donation on Weibo, a social media platform, and to identify the media themes that are most advantageous in promoting public awareness and attitudes concerning organ donation.

methodsBased on 16 million social media users' posts randomly extracted from January 1 to December 31, 2017, 1507 reposts of 141 distinct media posts relevant to organ donation were found. We analyzed the media posts' themes and examined their effects in promoting public awareness about organ donation by comparing the number of reposts and comments they prompted. The themes' impact on attitude toward organ donation was gauged using the comments indicating support and intentions for organ donation.

resultsOverall, 5 major themes were identified from the media posts, among which "organ donation behaviors" constituted the highest proportion (58/141, 41.13%). However, themes of "statistical descriptions of organ donation" and "meaningfulness of donation" were the most influential in promoting awareness on organ donation: approximately 3 of 10 commenters for the former theme and 2 of 10 commenters for the latter expressed intentions to become organ donors. These two themes, along with "meaningfulness of organ donation for society," a subtheme of "meaningfulness of donation," were the most effective for evoking support and intentions for donation.

conclusionsA discrepancy was revealed between the media themes that were the most salient on the media agenda and those that were the most effective in increasing organ donation awareness and intentions on social media. These findings provide guidance for campaigns on organ donation. The results also suggest the potential of campaigns on social media for promoting prosocial health behaviors and highlight the importance of strategic message design for serving this goal.

Indexed as

FemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMotivationSocial MediaSurveys and QuestionnairesTissue and Organ Procurementmediamedia effectsorgan donationsocial media

Identifiers

PMID30860489
PMCPMC6434401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.