Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30860484›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2019

Early Identification of Preterm Neonates at Birth With a Tablet App for the Simplified Gestational Age Score (T-SGAS) When Ultrasound Gestational Age Dating Is Unavailable: Protocol for a Validation Study.

Archana B Patel, Kunal Kurhe, Amber Prakash, Savita Bhargav, Suchita Parepalli, Elizabeth V Fogleman, Janet L Moore, Dennis D Wallace, Hemant Kulkarni, Patricia L Hibberd

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02408783 (Validation of a New Simplified Score for Assessing Gestational Age of Newborns in Community), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02408783 completednot on this map

Validation of a New Simplified Score for Assessing Gestational Age of Newborns in Community

TypeobservationalSponsorNICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's HealthRan2015 to 2016Enrolled15,920ConditionsGestational Age and Weight Conditions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Archana B PatelLata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2558-7421
Kunal KurheLata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6032-8943
Amber PrakashLata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-8956
Savita BhargavLata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4718-3927
Suchita ParepalliRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4514-7105
Elizabeth V FoglemanRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5730-2200
Janet L MooreRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1750-8794
Dennis D WallaceRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-3397
Hemant KulkarniLata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6950-3341
Patricia L HibberdDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7455-8117
Lata Medical Research Foundation · INRTI International · USBoston University · US

Funding

Boston University/Lata Medical Research Foundation Global Network for Women's Children's Health Research UnitUG1HD078439 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Patricia L Hibberd · 2018 to 2026
$5.5M
NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD078439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough rates of preterm birth continue to increase globally, identification of preterm from low birth weight infants remains a challenge. The burden of low birth weight vs preterm is greatest in resource-limited settings, where gestational age (GA) prior to delivery is frequently not known because ultrasound in early pregnancy is not available and estimates of the date of the mother's last menstrual period (LMP) may not be reliable. An alternative option is to assess GA at birth to optimize referral and care of preterm newborns. We previously developed and pilot-tested a system to measure the simplified gestational age score (SGAS) based on 4 easily observable neonatal characteristics.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to adapt the scoring system as a tablet app (potentially scalable approach) to assess feasibility of use and to validate whether the scoring system accurately predicts prematurity by itself, over and above birth weight in a large sample of newborns.

methodsThe study is based in Nagpur, India, at the Research Unit of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development's Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research. The Android tablet app for the SGAS (T-SGAS) displays de-identified photographs of skin, breasts, and genitalia across a range of GAs and line drawings of infant posture. Each item is associated with a score. The user is trained to choose the photograph or line drawing that most closely matches the newborn being evaluated, and the app determines the neonate's GA category (preterm or term) from the cumulative score. The validation study will be conducted in 3 second level care facilities (most deliveries in India occur in hospitals, and women known to be at risk of preterm birth are referred to second level care facilities). Within 24 hours of delivery, women and their babies who are stable will be enrolled in the study. Two auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs) blinded to prior GA assessments will use the T-SGAS to estimate the GA status of the newborn. An independent data collector will abstract the GA from the ultrasound recorded in the hospital chart and record the date of the mother's LMP. Eligibility for analysis is determined by the ultrasound and LMP data being collected within 1 week of each other to have a rigorous assessment of true GA.

resultsPublication of the results of the study is anticipated in 2019.

conclusionsUntil GA dating by ultrasound is universally available and easy to use in resource-limited settings, and where there are restrictions on ultrasound use due to their use for sex determination and abortion of female fetuses, this study will determine whether the T-SGAS app can accurately assess GA in risk categories at birth.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02408783; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02408783 (Archived by Webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/75S2kmr3T). INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/11913.

Indexed as

gestational age assessmentlast menstrual periodmHealthnewbornprematurityultrasound

Identifiers

PMID30860484
PMCPMC6434403
OpenAlexW4246874761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.