ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019
Analysis of magnetization transfer (MT) influence on quantitative mapping of T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined ADC and TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Methods for Uncertainty Quantification in Dictionary Matching to Advance Reliability of Quantitative MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Importance of RMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of the Magnetization Transfer Effect on T1 Measurements in Quantitative MR Imaging: Comparison of the Two-dimensional Multidynamic Multiecho (2D-MDME) and Three-dimensional Quantification Using an Interleaved Look-Locker Acquisition Sequence (3D-QALAS) Protocols on Two Systems.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- High-resolution quantitative TImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Evaluating T1, T2 Relaxation, and Proton Density in Normal Brain Using Synthetic MRI with Fast Imaging Protocol.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2024Article
- A comprehensive protocol for quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the brain at 3 Tesla.PloS one · 2024Article
- Probing microstructural changes in muscles of leptin-deficient zebrafish by non-invasive ex-vivo magnetic resonance microimaging.PloS one · 2023Article
- Three-dimensional high-resolution TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Three-dimensional whole-brain simultaneous T1, T2, and T1ρ quantification using MR Multitasking: Method and initial clinical experience in tissue characterization of multiple sclerosis.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Exercise-induced muscle damage: mechanism, assessment and nutritional factors to accelerate recovery.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Review
- Quantitative muscle MRI as a sensitive marker of early muscle pathology in myotonic dystrophy type 1.Muscle & nerve · 2021Article
- Fast Open-Source Toolkit for Water T2 Mapping in the Presence of Fat From Multi-Echo Spin-Echo Acquisitions for Muscle MRI.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Fast TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Magnetization transfer in magnetic resonance fingerprinting.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMulti-echo spin-echo (MESE) protocol is the most effective tool for mapping T
methodsStudy used 3 models: in vitro urea phantom, ex vivo horse brain, and in vivo human brain. MT ratio (MTR) was measured between single-SE and MESE protocols under different scan settings including varying echo train lengths, number of slices, and inter-slice gap. MTR and T
resultsMT interactions biased MESE signals, and in certain settings, the corresponding T
conclusionsMT influences MESE protocols either by uniformly attenuating the entire echo train or by cumulatively attenuating the signal along the train. Although both processes depend on scan settings and MMP content, only the latter will cause underestimation of T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.