Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30859922›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2019

Do Europeans consider sustainability when making food choices? A survey of Polish city-dwellers.

Krystyna Rejman, Joanna Kaczorowska, Ewa Halicka, Wacław Laskowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sustainable Nutrition Knowledge and Behaviours in Highly Educated Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Carbon dioxide (COEnvironmental health : a global access science source · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Krystyna RejmanDepartment of Organisation and Consumption Economics, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences,Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW),Nowoursynowska 159 C Street,02-776Warsaw,Poland.
Joanna KaczorowskaDepartment of Organisation and Consumption Economics, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences,Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW),Nowoursynowska 159 C Street,02-776Warsaw,Poland.
Ewa HalickaDepartment of Organisation and Consumption Economics, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences,Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW),Nowoursynowska 159 C Street,02-776Warsaw,Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0535-2115
Wacław LaskowskiDepartment of Organisation and Consumption Economics, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences,Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW),Nowoursynowska 159 C Street,02-776Warsaw,Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo obtain a better insight into the conceptualization of sustainable consumption among consumers with special focus on food choice determinants. Previous studies show that people present positive attitude towards sustainable diet while their everyday food choices do not follow sustainable diet rules.

designA structured questionnaire was designed and data were collected via computer-assisted telephone interview among a random group (n 600) of city-dwellers. Quota sampling was used in proportion to the city population. Cluster analysis (k-means method) was applied to identify consumer segments according to the determinants of food choices. Consumer segments were identified using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Duncan comparison of mean scores and cross-tabulation with χ 2. The Friedman test was applied to identify enablers and barriers of sustainable food choices.

settingCities in Mazovia, the best developed, central region of Poland.ParticipantsAdults (21-70 years old).

resultsConsumers are not familiar with the concept of sustainability and are not able to define it adequately. Only 6 % of the studied population indicated that sustainable consumption is connected with nutrition which has possibly less impact on the environment. Three segments of consumers were distinguished regarding their attitude to food choice determinants adequate to sustainable diet: Non-Adopters (17 %), Emergents (32 %), Adopters (51 %). Desire to improve health by decreasing body weight was the main driver for sustainable food choices, while prices were the main limitation.

conclusionsKnowledge dissemination on sustainability issues is needed to empower consumers to make more sustainable food choices and to make public health and food policy measures more effective.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesConsumer BehaviorFood PreferencesAdultAgedFemaleFood SupplyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandUrban PopulationConsumerFood choice determinantsPolandSustainable diet

Identifiers

PMID30859922
PMCPMC6536826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.