ArticleBrain and behavior2019
Clinical characteristics and risk score for poor clinical outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis therapy.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote ischemic conditioning combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2020Trial
- Pre-Treatment Levels of Inflammatory Biomarkers as Predictors of Reperfusion Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Outcomes and risk factors for functional prognosis at 3 months after intravenous thrombolysis with r-tPA in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study.Thrombosis journal · 2025Article
- Predicting ineffective thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke with clinical and biochemical markers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- C-Reactive Protein and White Blood Cell Count in Non-Infective Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated with Intravenous Thrombolysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Early prediction of the 3-month outcome for individual acute ischemic stroke patients who received intravenous thrombolysis using the N2H3 nomogram model.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2020Article
- Clinical characteristics and risk score for poor clinical outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis therapy.Brain and behavior · 2019Article
- Higher Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is Associated With Worse Outcomes After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischaemic Stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) is an effective therapy for acute ischemic stroke, but some patients still have poor clinical outcome. In this study, we investigated clinical characteristics of stroke patients and determined predictors for poor clinical outcome in response to t-PA treatment.
methodsClinical data from 247 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical parameters that were associated with survival of patients were analyzed. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were used to determine the feasibility of using various combinations of the clinical parameters to predict poor clinical response. The clinical outcome was defined according to the changes in Modified Rankin Scale.
resultsOverall, 145 patients had improved/complete recovery, 73 had no change, and 29 had worsening conditions or died during the in-clinic period. A univariate analysis showed that baseline characteristics including age, CRP, blood glucose level, systolic blood pressure, and admission NIHSS were significantly different (p < 0.05) among patients with different clinical outcome. A further multivariate analysis was then performed. Variables associated with poor clinical outcome (worsening/death) (p < 0.1) were included in the logistic regression model. Four parameters were retained in the model: Age, CRP, Blood glucose level, and Systolic blood pressure (ACBS). To allow a convenient usage of the ACBS classifier, the parameters were put into a scoring system, and the score at 7.7 was chosen as a cut-off. The ROC curve of this ACBS classifier has an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7788, higher than other individual parameters. The ACBS classifier provided enhanced sensitivity of 69.2% and specificity of 74.3%.
conclusionThe ACBS classifier provided a satisfactory power in estimating the patients' clinical outcome. After further validating, the classifier may provide important information to clinicians for making clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.