Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30859604›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2019

Monitoring mosaic biotopes in a marine conservation zone by autonomous underwater vehicle.

Noëlie M A Benoist, Kirsty J Morris, Brian J Bett, Jennifer M Durden, Veerle A I Huvenne, Tim P Le Bas, Russell B Wynn, Suzanne J Ware, Henry A Ruhl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Noëlie M A BenoistOcean Biogeochemistry and Ecosystems, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-1978-3538
Kirsty J MorrisOcean Biogeochemistry and Ecosystems, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, U.K.
Brian J BettOcean Biogeochemistry and Ecosystems, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, U.K.
Jennifer M DurdenOcean Biogeochemistry and Ecosystems, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, U.K.
Veerle A I HuvenneOcean Biogeochemistry and Ecosystems, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, U.K.
Tim P Le BasOcean Biogeochemistry and Ecosystems, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, U.K.
Russell B WynnOcean Biogeochemistry and Ecosystems, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, U.K.
Suzanne J WareCentre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT, U.K.
Henry A RuhlOcean Biogeochemistry and Ecosystems, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of marine protected areas (MPAs) has increased dramatically in the last decade and poses a major logistic challenge for conservation practitioners in terms of spatial extent and the multiplicity of habitats and biotopes that now require assessment. Photographic assessment by autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) enables the consistent description of multiple habitats, in our case including mosaics of rock and sediment. As a case study, we used this method to survey the Greater Haig Fras marine conservation zone (Celtic Sea, northeast Atlantic). We distinguished 7 biotopes, detected statistically significant variations in standing stocks, species density, species diversity, and faunal composition, and identified significant indicator species for each habitat. Our results demonstrate that AUV-based photography can produce robust data for ecological research and practical marine conservation. Standardizing to a minimum number of individuals per sampling unit, rather than to a fixed seafloor area, may be a valuable means of defining an ecologically appropriate sampling unit. Although composite sampling represents a change in standard practice, other users should consider the potential benefits of this approach in conservation studies. It is broadly applicable in the marine environment and has been successfully implemented in deep-sea conservation and environmental impact studies. Without a cost-effective method, applicable across habitats, it will be difficult to further a coherent classification of biotopes or to routinely assess their conservation status in the rapidly expanding global extent of MPAs.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEcologyHumansárea marina protegidabenthosbentosbiotope classificationclasificación de biotoposecological metricsfondo marinomarine protected areamedidas ecológicasmosaic habitatsmosaico de hábitatsseafloor海底海底生物海洋保护区生态指标群落生境分类镶嵌型生境

Identifiers

PMID30859604
PMCPMC6850053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.