Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30859599›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2019

Oral health and oral care in short-term care: prevalence, related factors and coherence between older peoples' and professionals' assessments.

Susanne Koistinen, Lena Olai, Katri Ståhlnacke, Anna Fält, Anna Ehrenberg

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nursing home residents' perspectives on oral health: An in-depth interview study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susanne KoistinenSchool of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Dalarna, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0290-5586
Lena OlaiSchool of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Dalarna, Sweden.
Katri StåhlnackeSchool of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Anna FältClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Anna EhrenbergSchool of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Dalarna, Sweden.

Funding

Kamprad Family Foundation for Entrepreneurship, Research, and CharityÖrebro CountyRegional Research Board of Uppsala-ÖrebroSwedish Research CouncilSwedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare (Forte)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral health is important for well-being and overall health. Older peoples' oral health is well described in the residential care context, but remains understudied in short-term care.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe oral health, daily oral care and related factors among older people in short-term care and to compare self-perceived oral health with professional assessment. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 391 older people in 36 short-term units in 19 Swedish municipalities. Oral health was assessed professionally by clinical oral assessment and the Revised Oral Assessment Guide (ROAG). The older peoples' perceptions of their own oral health were measured with a global question on self-perceived oral health. Self-care ability was assessed with Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living (Katz-ADL).

resultsMean age was 82.9 years, 19% of participants were totally edentulous, and 43% had ≥20 teeth. Almost 60% had coating or food debris on their teeth, but only 19% received help with daily oral care. Those who were dependent on help with self-care had around a sixfold higher risk of having oral problems. There was a low level of agreement between the clinical assessment based on ROAG and self-perceived oral health.

conclusionProfessionals' assessments of oral health differed considerably from the older peoples' own assessments. A higher risk of oral problems and more occurrence of coating or food debris or broken teeth were seen among those dependent on help with self-care (ADL). This study indicates that in order to improve older peoples' oral health and oral care we need to provide person-centred oral care and to develop a close collaboration between nursing and dental staff.

Indexed as

Oral HealthActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFrail ElderlyGeriatric NursingHumansMalePrevalenceQuality of LifeSelf CareSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenfunctional abilityolder peopleoral careoral healthself-perceivedshort-term care

Identifiers

PMID30859599
PMCPMC7328680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.