Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30859559›Full record

ArticleClinical genetics2019

Delineation of dominant and recessive forms of LZTR1-associated Noonan syndrome.

Alistair T Pagnamenta, Pamela J Kaisaki, Fenella Bennett, Emma Burkitt-Wright, Hilary C Martin, Matteo P Ferla, John M Taylor, Lianne Gompertz, Nayana Lahiri, Katrina Tatton-Brown and 17 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Noonan syndrome: rhGH treatment and PTPN11 mutation.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Alistair T PagnamentaNIHR Oxford BRC, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7334-0602
Pamela J KaisakiNIHR Oxford BRC, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Fenella BennettNIHR Oxford BRC, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Emma Burkitt-WrightManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.
Hilary C MartinWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Matteo P FerlaNIHR Oxford BRC, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
John M TaylorOxford NHS Regional Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
Lianne GompertzManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.
Nayana LahiriSouth West Thames Regional Genetics Service, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Katrina Tatton-BrownSouth West Thames Regional Genetics Service, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ruth Newbury-EcobDepartment of Clinical Genetics, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Alex HendersonNorthern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Shelagh JossWest of Scotland Regional Genetics Service, Laboratory Medicine Building, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Astrid WeberDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Jenny CarmichaelOxford Regional Clinical Genetics Service, Northampton General Hospital, Northampton, UK.
Peter D TurnpennyClinical Genetics Department, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Shane McKeeNorthern Ireland Regional Genetics Service, Belfast HSC Trust, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Francesca ForzanoClinical Genetics Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Tazeen AshrafClinical Genetics Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kimberley BradburyClinical Genetics Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Deborah ShearsOxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Usha KiniOxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Anna de BurcaOxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
DDD StudyWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Edward BlairOxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Jenny C TaylorNIHR Oxford BRC, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Helen StewartOxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Centre for Human Genetics · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Ulster · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_PC_16018Wellcome Trust 090532/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust WT098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noonan syndrome (NS) is characterised by distinctive facial features, heart defects, variable degrees of intellectual disability and other phenotypic manifestations. Although the mode of inheritance is typically dominant, recent studies indicate LZTR1 may be associated with both dominant and recessive forms. Seeking to describe the phenotypic characteristics of LZTR1-associated NS, we searched for likely pathogenic variants using two approaches. First, scrutiny of exomes from 9624 patients recruited by the Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDDs) study uncovered six dominantly-acting mutations (p.R97L; p.Y136C; p.Y136H, p.N145I, p.S244C; p.G248R) of which five arose de novo, and three patients with compound-heterozygous variants (p.R210*/p.V579M; p.R210*/p.D531N; c.1149+1G>T/p.R688C). One patient also had biallelic loss-of-function mutations in NEB, consistent with a composite phenotype. After removing this complex case, analysis of human phenotype ontology terms indicated significant phenotypic similarities (P = 0.0005), supporting a causal role for LZTR1. Second, targeted sequencing of eight unsolved NS-like cases identified biallelic LZTR1 variants in three further subjects (p.W469*/p.Y749C, p.W437*/c.-38T>A and p.A461D/p.I462T). Our study strengthens the association of LZTR1 with NS, with de novo mutations clustering around the KT1-4 domains. Although LZTR1 variants explain ~0.1% of cases across the DDD cohort, the gene is a relatively common cause of unsolved NS cases where recessive inheritance is suspected.

Indexed as

ExomeAdolescentAllelesChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleGene OntologyGenes, DominantGenes, RecessiveHeterozygoteHumansInfantMaleMutationNoonan SyndromeLZTR1 protein, humanTranscription Factorsdevelopmental disorderexomeLZTR1Noonan syndromeRAS-MAPK signalling

Identifiers

PMID30859559
PMCPMC6563422
OpenAlexW2921448216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.