Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30859545›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2019

Causal inference with interfering units for cluster and population level treatment allocation programs.

Georgia Papadogeorgou, Fabrizia Mealli, Corwin M Zigler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. G-estimation with partial interference.Stat (International Statistical Institute) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A SPATIAL CAUSAL ANALYSIS OF WILDLAND FIRE-CONTRIBUTED PMThe annals of applied statistics · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Review of Spatial Causal Inference Methods for Environmental and Epidemiological Applications.International statistical review = Revue internationale de statistique · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Bipartite Causal Inference with Interference.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Georgia PapadogeorgouDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-1982-2245
Fabrizia MealliDepartment of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Corwin M ZiglerDepartment of Statistics and Data Sciences and Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin and Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-9611-5894

Funding

Causal Inference with Interference for Evaluating Air Quality PoliciesR01ES026217 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ZIGLER, CORWIN MATTHEW · 2016 to 2021
$2.2M
EPA R835872C004NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES026217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interference arises when an individual's potential outcome depends on the individual treatment level, but also on the treatment level of others. A common assumption in the causal inference literature in the presence of interference is partial interference, implying that the population can be partitioned in clusters of individuals whose potential outcomes only depend on the treatment of units within the same cluster. Previous literature has defined average potential outcomes under counterfactual scenarios where treatments are randomly allocated to units within a cluster. However, within clusters there may be units that are more or less likely to receive treatment based on covariates or neighbors' treatment. We define new estimands that describe average potential outcomes for realistic counterfactual treatment allocation programs, extending existing estimands to take into consideration the units' covariates and dependence between units' treatment assignment. We further propose entirely new estimands for population-level interventions over the collection of clusters, which correspond in the motivating setting to regulations at the federal (vs. cluster or regional) level. We discuss these estimands, propose unbiased estimators and derive asymptotic results as the number of clusters grows. For a small number of observed clusters, a bootstrap approach for confidence intervals is proposed. Finally, we estimate effects in a comparative effectiveness study of power plant emission reduction technologies on ambient ozone pollution.

Indexed as

CausalityCluster AnalysisModels, StatisticalAir PollutionComputer SimulationHumansOzonePower PlantsTreatment OutcomeOzoneair pollutionInterferenceinverse probability weightingpolicy evaluation

Identifiers

PMID30859545
PMCPMC6784535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.