ReviewAmbio2020
Storing and sharing: A review of indigenous and local knowledge conservation initiatives.
Review in Ambio, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Gendered traditional agroecological knowledge in agri-food systems: a systematic review.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2023Pooled it
- The benefits of Q + PPGIS for coupled human-natural systems research: A systematic review.Ambio · 2022Pooled it
- Traditional medicinal plant based remedies for common ailments in Menz Keya Gebreal District, North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- The global relevance of locally grounded ethnobiology.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Local reports of climate change impacts in Sierra Nevada, Spain: sociodemographic and geographical patterns.Regional environmental change · 2023Article
- An Instructor's Guide to Including Traditional Ecological Knowledge in the Undergraduate Biology Classroom.CBE life sciences education · 2022Article
- Linking small-scale fisheries co-management to U.N. Sustainable Development Goals.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022Article
- CANNUSE, a database of traditional Cannabis uses-an opportunity for new research.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021Article
- The Pacific Region Indigenous Doctors Congress Medical Student Track Report.Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite its relative adaptive capacity and its many values, indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) is rapidly eroding. Over the past decades a myriad of efforts have emerged to prevent this erosion. In this work, we reviewed and systematically coded 138 ILK conservation initiatives published in academic papers in order to explore trends in participation, digitalization, timing, location, and approach of the initiatives. We also explored factors influencing initiative inclusiveness. Our findings reveal that ILK holders are generally absent from most phases of the studied initiatives, although IT-based and in situ initiatives (i.e., education and community based conservation) appear as the exceptions. We also found that ex situ initiatives (i.e., research/documentation and policy/legislation efforts) are predominant, despite the challenges they reportedly face. These findings call for re-formulating the ways in which ex situ ILK conservation is done and for supporting in situ and IT based initiatives, as they offer the potential to lead the participatory turn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.