Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30859281›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Convolutional neural network to predict the local recurrence of giant cell tumor of bone after curettage based on pre-surgery magnetic resonance images.

Yifeng He, Jiapan Guo, Xiaoyi Ding, Peter M A van Ooijen, Yaping Zhang, An Chen, Matthijs Oudkerk, Xueqian Xie

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. [Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic oncology].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Artificial Intelligence Applications in Musculoskeletal Imaging.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yifeng HeRadiology Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, HaiNing Rd.100, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Jiapan GuoUniversity Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging - North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Xiaoyi DingRadiology Department, RuiJin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, RuiJin No.2 Rd.197, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Peter M A van OoijenUniversity Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging - North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Yaping ZhangRadiology Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, HaiNing Rd.100, Shanghai, 200080, China.
An ChenRadiology Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, HaiNing Rd.100, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Matthijs OudkerkUniversity Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging - North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Xueqian XieRadiology Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, HaiNing Rd.100, Shanghai, 200080, China. xiexueqian@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6669-0097
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

Clinical Research Innovation Plan of Shanghai General Hospital CTCCR-2018B04Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFE0103000National Natural Science Foundation of China 81471662School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University 20181814Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 16410722300Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 16411968500Shanghai Jiao Tong University ZH2018ZDB10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo predict the local recurrence of giant cell bone tumors (GCTB) on MR features and the clinical characteristics after curettage using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN).

methodsMR images were collected from 56 patients with histopathologically confirmed GCTB after curettage who were followed up for 5.8 years (range, 2.0 to 9.5 years). The inception v3 CNN architecture was fine-tuned by two categories of the MR datasets (recurrent and non-recurrent GCTB) obtained through data augmentation and was validated using fourfold cross-validation to evaluate its generalization ability. Twenty-eight cases (50%) were chosen as the training dataset for the CNN and four radiologists, while the remaining 28 cases (50%) were used as the test dataset. A binary logistic regression model was established to predict recurrent GCTB by combining the CNN prediction and patient features (age and tumor location). Accuracy and sensitivity were used to evaluate the prediction performance.

resultsWhen comparing the CNN, CNN regression, and radiologists, the accuracies of the CNN and CNN regression models were 75.5% (95% CI 55.1 to 89.3%) and 78.6% (59.0 to 91.7%), respectively, which were higher than the 64.3% (44.1 to 81.4%) accuracy of the radiologists. The sensitivities were 85.7% (42.1 to 99.6%) and 87.5% (47.3 to 99.7%), respectively, which were higher than the 58.3% (27.7 to 84.8%) sensitivity of the radiologists (p < 0.05).

conclusionThe CNN has the potential to predict recurrent GCTB after curettage. A binary regression model combined with patient characteristics improves its prediction accuracy. KEY POINTS: • Convolutional neural network (CNN) can be trained successfully on a limited number of pre-surgery MR images, by fine-tuning a pre-trained CNN architecture. • CNN has an accuracy of 75.5% to predict post-surgery recurrence of giant cell tumors of bone, which surpasses the 64.3% accuracy of human observation. • A binary logistic regression model combining CNN prediction rate, patient age, and tumor location improves the accuracy to predict post-surgery recurrence of giant cell bone tumors to 78.6%.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsBone and BonesBone NeoplasmsCurettageFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGiant Cell Tumor of BoneHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLogistic ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedArtificial intelligenceGiant cell tumor of boneMagnetic resonance imagingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID30859281
OpenAlexW2922203083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.