ReviewDer Internist2019
[Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and C3 glomerulopathy].
Review in Der Internist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on an increasingly better pathophysiological understanding over the last 10 years, in 2010 a new classification of glomerulonephritis with dominant or codominant C3 deposits was introduced and the predominant subgoup was termed C3 glomerulopathy (C3G). In the current classification, immune complex mediated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) and C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) form a disease spectrum which is very heterogeneous in terms of pathophysiology and the clinical course. Recent evidence suggests that IC-MPGN and C3G share more pathophysiological aspects with respect to secondary causes, autoantibodies and genetic aspects than had been suggested with the creation of the new classification. Knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology is important for guiding the diagnostic steps for clarification of secondary causes. Comprehensive complement analysis, accompanied by antibody screening and genetic analysis, should be consistently carried out. Although not systematically validated in clinical trials, the published evidence provides a robust foundation for the use of available treatment approaches for these diseases that are often rapidly progressive and often return after renal transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30859280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.