Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30859252›Full record

ArticleHNO2019

[A sound reproduction system using wave field synthesis to simulate everyday listening conditions].

T Weißgerber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

T WeißgerberSchwerpunkt Audiologische Akustik, Klinik für HNO-Heilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7/Haus 8, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Deutschland. tobias.weissgerber@kgu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTest procedures used in clinical routine are often not sufficiently accurate to evaluate the auditory benefit of hearing systems and the improvements brought by new signal preprocessing algorithms.

objectiveThe aim of the study was to realize and evaluate a sound reproduction system for simulation of everyday listening conditions. MATERIALS AND

methodsA sound reproduction system was developed using 128 loudspeakers. By appropriate superposition of the loudspeaker signals (so-called wave field synthesis), it is possible to create almost arbitrary everyday listening conditions in a reproducible laboratory setting. Auditory scenes can be changed in real time. The sound reproduction system was mechanically evaluated by measuring the sound field with a microphone array. To validate the system, speech reception thresholds (SRT) were measured in bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users in moving and diffuse noise conditions. Furthermore, the impact of different types of directional microphones on speech perception was assessed.

resultsWith a moving noise source in the dorsal half-space, CI users showed significant SRT improvements by using directional microphones with higher directional sensitivity (2.5 dB improvement) as well as with adaptive directional sensitivity (8.5 dB). The benefit of adaptive directional microphones is reduced in environments with diffuse noise.

conclusionWave field synthesis is a useful tool to simulate everyday listening conditions in a reproducible laboratory environment. This technique can complement established clinical methods to assess the benefit of a hearing device fitting or of signal preprocessing algorithms in dynamic listening conditions.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsSound LocalizationSpeech PerceptionAuditory ThresholdCochlear ImplantationEquipment DesignHearingHearing AidsHearing LossHumansNoiseCochlear implantHearing lossNoiseSpeech perceptionVirtual acoustics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.