ArticleHNO2019
[A sound reproduction system using wave field synthesis to simulate everyday listening conditions].
Article in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Improved binaural speech reception thresholds through small symmetrical separation of speech and noise.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTest procedures used in clinical routine are often not sufficiently accurate to evaluate the auditory benefit of hearing systems and the improvements brought by new signal preprocessing algorithms.
objectiveThe aim of the study was to realize and evaluate a sound reproduction system for simulation of everyday listening conditions. MATERIALS AND
methodsA sound reproduction system was developed using 128 loudspeakers. By appropriate superposition of the loudspeaker signals (so-called wave field synthesis), it is possible to create almost arbitrary everyday listening conditions in a reproducible laboratory setting. Auditory scenes can be changed in real time. The sound reproduction system was mechanically evaluated by measuring the sound field with a microphone array. To validate the system, speech reception thresholds (SRT) were measured in bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users in moving and diffuse noise conditions. Furthermore, the impact of different types of directional microphones on speech perception was assessed.
resultsWith a moving noise source in the dorsal half-space, CI users showed significant SRT improvements by using directional microphones with higher directional sensitivity (2.5 dB improvement) as well as with adaptive directional sensitivity (8.5 dB). The benefit of adaptive directional microphones is reduced in environments with diffuse noise.
conclusionWave field synthesis is a useful tool to simulate everyday listening conditions in a reproducible laboratory environment. This technique can complement established clinical methods to assess the benefit of a hearing device fitting or of signal preprocessing algorithms in dynamic listening conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30859252What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.