Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30859239›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Characteristics of motor unit recruitment in boys and men at maximal and submaximal force levels.

Emeric Chalchat, Enzo Piponnier, Bastien Bontemps, Valérie Julian, Olivia Bocock, Martine Duclos, Sébastien Ratel, Vincent Martin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A question of rate? Girl-women differences in motor unit firing rate.European journal of applied physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emeric ChalchatClermont-Auvergne University, AME2P, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Enzo PiponnierClermont-Auvergne University, AME2P, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bastien BontempsClermont-Auvergne University, AME2P, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Valérie JulianClermont University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Olivia BocockClermont University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Martine DuclosClermont University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Sébastien RatelClermont-Auvergne University, AME2P, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Vincent MartinClermont-Auvergne University, AME2P, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France. vincent.martin@uca.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6681-1610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare voluntary activation (VA) and motor units (MU) recruitment patterns between boys and men at different contraction levels of the knee extensor muscles. We hypothesized that boys and men would display similar VA and MU recruitment patterns at low submaximal force levels, but that boys would display a lower utilization of their higher-threshold MU and a lower VA at near-maximal and maximal force levels than men. 11 prepubertal boys and 13 men were tested at the optimal knee angle. Next, VA was assessed using the twitch interpolation technique during maximal (MVC) and submaximal isometric voluntary contractions. Mean firing rate (MFR), recruitment threshold (RT) and motor unit action potential size (MUAP

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsChildElectromyographyHumansIsometric ContractionMalePhysical StimulationQuadriceps MuscleRecruitment, NeurophysiologicalYoung AdultChildrenEMG decompositionMagnetic nerve stimulationMuscle activation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.