ArticleReproductive biomedicine & society online2019
Honouring 'Patient 38' - a mother of all IVF mothers?
Article in Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reproductive capital: theoretical foundations and empirical evidence from the workplace.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- The Evolving Concept of Poor-Prognosis for Women Undertaking IVF and the Notion of Growth Hormone as an Adjuvant; A Single-Center Viewpoint.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This commentary addresses one aspect of the early history of IVF in Britain. Specific data are re-examined from the recently published, anonymized database of medical records from the Oldham period of research conducted by Robert Edwards, Patrick Steptoe and their team of assistants between 1969 and 1978. By focusing on a reformulation of the 'scheduled treatment cycles per patient', attention is drawn to the small, but nevertheless not insignificant, number of subjects who returned to Oldham at least five times or more to undergo innovative procedures and/or receive other experimental treatments over the duration of the research project. These multiple efforts are contrasted with the single or double treatment cycles received by the majority of the infertile women involved, including the only two experiencing live births, Lesley Brown and Grace Montgomery. The re-presented data facilitates new interpretations and raises fresh research questions about the nature of contemporary and present characterisations of the major protagonists in the 'IVF story', the identity of those women who originally took part and the origin of and reasons for discrepancies in the records maintained about research subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.