Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30859097›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2019

Development of Electrochemical Nanosensor for the Detection of Malaria Parasite in Clinical Samples.

Olaoluwa R Obisesan, Abolanle S Adekunle, John A O Oyekunle, Thomas Sabu, Thabo T I Nkambule, Bhekie B Mamba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sensitive Immunoassay Detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Current Trends of Nanobiosensors for Point-of-Care Diagnostics.Journal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Olaoluwa R ObisesanDepartment of Chemistry, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Abolanle S AdekunleDepartment of Chemistry, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
John A O OyekunleDepartment of Chemistry, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Thomas SabuInternational and Inter University Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, India.
Thabo T I NkambuleNanotechnology and Water Sustainability Research Unit, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Univeristy of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Bhekie B MambaNanotechnology and Water Sustainability Research Unit, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Univeristy of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Obafemi Awolowo University · NGMahatma Gandhi University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, electrochemical nanosensors were developed from the synthesized metal oxide (MO) nanoparticles by supporting it on a gold electrode (Au). The activity of the developed nanosensor toward the detection of malaria biomarker (β-hematin) was determined and the optimum conditions at which the maximum detection and quantification occurred were established. β-Hematin current response at the sensors was higher when compared with the bare Au electrode and followed the order Au-CuO (C) > Au-CuO (M) > Au-Fe

Indexed as

biomarkerclinical samplescyclic voltammetrymalariametal oxide nanoparticlessensorsquare wave voltammetryβ-hematin

Identifiers

PMID30859097
PMCPMC6397833
OpenAlexW2915127621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.