Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30859039›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2019

Dynamics of Face and Head Movement in Infants with and without Craniofacial Microsomia: An Automatic Approach.

Zakia Hammal, Erin R Wallace, Matthew L Speltz, Carrie L Heike, Craig B Birgfeld, Jeffrey F Cohn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychosocial and Health-Related Experiences of Individuals With Microtia and Craniofacial Microsomia and Their Families: Narrative Review Over 2 Decades.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Face and Gesture Analysis for Health Informatics.Proceedings of the ... ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ICMI (Conference) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zakia HammalRobotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Erin R WallaceSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Wash.
Matthew L SpeltzSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Wash.
Carrie L HeikeSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Wash.
Craig B BirgfeldSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Wash.
Jeffrey F CohnRobotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa.
University of Washington · USCarnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesUL1TR000423 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$49.4M
CFM: Longitudinal Outcomes in Children pre-Kindergarten (CLOCK)R01DE022438 · NIDCR · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI HEIKE, CARRIE LYN, SPELTZ, MATTHEW LOUIS · 2012 to 2018
$4.7M
Craniofacial Microsmia: Facial Expression from Ages 1 to 3 YearsR03DE026513 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COHN, JEFFREY F · 2017 to 2018
$323k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000423NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022438NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE026513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCraniofacial microsomia (CFM) is a congenital condition associated with malformations of the bone and soft tissue of the face and the facial nerves, all of which have the potential to impair facial expressiveness. We investigated whether CFM-related variation in expressiveness is evident as early as infancy.

methodsParticipants were 113 ethnically diverse 13-month-old infants (n = 63 cases with CFM and n = 50 unaffected matched controls). They were observed in 2 emotion induction tasks designed to elicit positive and negative effects. Facial and head movement was automatically measured using a computer vision-based approach. Expressiveness was quantified as the displacement, velocity, and acceleration of 49 facial landmarks (eg, lip corners) and head pitch and yaw.

resultsFor both cases and controls, all measures of expressiveness strongly differed between tasks. Case-control differences were limited to infants with microtia plus mandibular hypoplasia and other associated CFM features, which were the most common phenotypes and were characterized by decreased expressiveness relative to control infants.

conclusionsInfants with microtia plus mandibular hypoplasia and those with other associated CFM phenotypes were less facially expressive than same-aged peers. Both phenotypes were associated with more severe involvement than microtia alone, suggesting that infants with more severe CFM begin to diverge in expressiveness from controls by age 13 months. Further research is needed to both replicate the current findings and elucidate their developmental implications.

Identifiers

PMID30859039
PMCPMC6382247
OpenAlexW2908665358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.