Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30858985›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2019

Fish protein supplementation in older nursing home residents: a randomised, double-blind, pilot study.

Aslaug Drotningsvik, Åge Oterhals, Ola Flesland, Ottar Nygård, Oddrun A Gudbrandsen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03529344 (A 6-week Pilot Study to Investigate the Effects of Protein Hydrolysate From Blue Whiting on Glucose Regulation, Inflammation and Serum Lipids in Elderly Nursing Home Residents From Western Norway), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03529344 nacompletednot on this map

A 6-week Pilot Study to Investigate the Effects of Protein Hydrolysate From Blue Whiting on Glucose Regulation, Inflammation and Serum Lipids in Elderly Nursing Home Residents From Western Norway

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2016 to 2021Enrolled24ConditionsMuscle Weakness, Muscle Loss, Blood Sugar, HighArmsBlue whiting protein hydrolysate, Placebo Comparator: Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aslaug Drotningsvik1Dietary Protein Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, PO Box 7804, N-5021 Bergen, Norway.
Åge Oterhals3Nofima, P.O. Box 1425, Oasen, 5828 Bergen, Norway.
Ola Flesland2TripleNine Vedde AS, 6030 Langevåg, Norway.
Ottar Nygård4Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
Oddrun A Gudbrandsen1Dietary Protein Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, PO Box 7804, N-5021 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5268-692X
Vedde (Norway) · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NONofima · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAge-related loss of muscle mass and function is common in older adults, and studies investigating if dietary proteins may protect and possibly build lean body mass are needed. We assessed the feasibility of conducting a nutritional intervention study in older nursing home residents to investigate the effects of fish protein supplementation on markers of glucose metabolism and inflammation.

methodsThis was a double-blind randomised controlled pilot study. Twenty-four nursing home residents, without major cognitive impairment, received a daily oral nutritional supplement containing 5.2 g of fish protein or placebo for 6 weeks. Anthropometric measurements were conducted at baseline. Participants were screened for nutritional risk using the Mini Nutritional Assessment and activities of daily living using the Barthel index and dietary intake was registered. Hand grip strength was measured and fasting blood samples collected at baseline and endpoint.

resultsCompliance was high and dropout was low, but participant recruitment was challenging. Serum concentrations of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 decreased, and C-reactive protein increased in the intervention group compared to control, with no changes in markers of glucose metabolism between groups.

conclusionConducting a nutritional intervention using fish protein supplementation in older nursing home residents is feasible but should be conducted as a multi-centre study to account for the low recruitment rate observed in the present study. A full-scale study is needed to gain more knowledge on the potential effects of fish proteins on markers of glucose metabolism and inflammation in relation to the age-related loss of muscle mass and function.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03529344 18.05.2018 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Fish proteinFrail elderlyNursing homesPilot studySarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID30858985
PMCPMC6390537
OpenAlexW2938401171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.