Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30858926›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2019

Body surface area-based versus concentration-based intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy in a rat model of colorectal peritoneal surface malignancy: pharmacologic guidance towards standardization.

Lieselotte Lemoine, Elsy Thijssen, Robert Carleer, Jirka Cops, Veerle Lemmens, Peter Van Eyken, Paul Sugarbaker, Kurt Van der Speeten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lieselotte LemoineDepartment of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Elsy ThijssenDepartment of Applied and Analytical Chemistry, Institute for Materials Research (IMO), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Robert CarleerDepartment of Applied and Analytical Chemistry, Institute for Materials Research (IMO), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Jirka CopsDepartment of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Veerle LemmensDepartment of Medicine and Life Sciences, Dynamic Bioimaging Laboratory, Advanced Optical Microscopy Centre, Biomedical Research Institute (BIOMED), Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Peter Van EykenDepartment of Pathology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Paul SugarbakerCenter for Gastrointestinal Malignancies, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Kurt Van der SpeetenDepartment of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) are used in current clinical practice for colorectal peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) treatment. Although, there is an acknowledged standardization regarding the CRS, we are still lacking a much-needed standardization amongst the various intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy protocols, including the HIPEC dosing regimen. We should rely on pharmacologic evidence building towards such a standardization. The current IP chemotherapy dosing regimens can be divided into body surface area (BSA)-based and concentration-based protocols. A preclinical animal study was designed to evaluate pharmacologic advantage (PA), efficacy and survival. WAG/Rij rats were IP injected with the rat colonic carcinoma cell line CC-531. Animals were randomized into three groups: CRS alone or CRS combined with oxaliplatin-based HIPEC (either BSA- or concentration-based). There was no difference in PA between the two groups (p=0.283). Platinum concentration in the tumor nodule was significantly higher in the concentration-based group (

Indexed as

colorectal cancerdosimetryHIPECoxaliplatinperitoneal surface malignancy

Identifiers

PMID30858926
PMCPMC6402719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.