Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30858924›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2019

Application of cell-free DNA for genomic tumor profiling: a feasibility study.

Lise B Ahlborn, Kristoffer S Rohrberg, Migle Gabrielaite, Ida V Tuxen, Christina W Yde, Iben Spanggaard, Eric Santoni-Rugiu, Finn C Nielsen, Ulrik Lassen, Morten Mau-Sorensen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers for Personalized Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lise B AhlbornThe Phase I Unit, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristoffer S RohrbergThe Phase I Unit, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Migle GabrielaiteCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ida V TuxenThe Phase I Unit, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christina W YdeCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Iben SpanggaardThe Phase I Unit, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eric Santoni-RugiuDepartment of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Finn C NielsenCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ulrik LassenThe Phase I Unit, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten Mau-Sorensen *The Phase I Unit, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Olga Østrup *Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccess to genomic tumor material is required to select patients for targeted therapies. However, tissue biopsies are not always feasible and therefore circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has emerged as an alternative. Here we investigate the utility of cfDNA for genomic tumor profiling in the phase I setting. STUDY

designPeripheral blood was collected from patients with advanced solid cancers eligible for phase I treatment. Patients failing the initial tissue biopsy due to inaccessible lesions or insufficient tumor cellularity (<10%) were included in the study. Genomic profiling of cfDNA including whole exome sequencing (WES) and somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) analysis (OncoScan).

resultsPlasma cfDNA was pro- and retrospectively profiled from 24 and 20 patients, respectively. The median turnaround time was 29 days (

conclusionPlasma cfDNA profiling using WES is feasible within a clinically relevant timeframe and represents an alternative to invasive tissue biopsies to identify possible treatment targets. Especially, difficult-to-biopsy cancers can benefit from cfDNA profiling, but tumor tissue remains the gold standard for molecular analyses.

Indexed as

biopsycfDNAgenomic profileliquid biopsyWES

Identifiers

PMID30858924
PMCPMC6402712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.