Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30858896›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2019

Effectiveness and safety of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis patients in Canadian practice: 2-year results from the observational FαsT-CAN study.

Louis Bessette, Boulos Haraoui, Andrew Chow, Isabelle Fortin, Sanjay Dixit, Majed Khraishi, Derek Haaland, Sami Elmoufti, Fabienne Staelens, Irina Bogatyreva and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Monoclonal Antibodies for Chronic Pain Treatment: Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Louis BessetteDepartment of Medicine, Laval University, 2705, Laurier Boulevard, Québec City, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6834-2731
Boulos HaraouiDepartment of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Andrew ChowDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Isabelle FortinCentre de Rhumatologie de l'Est du Québec á Rimouski, Rimouski, Québec, Canada.
Sanjay DixitDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Majed KhraishiDepartment of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Derek HaalandDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sami ElmouftiUCB Pharma, Oakville, Ontario, Canada.
Fabienne StaelensUCB Pharma, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.
Irina BogatyrevaUCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium.
Jerry SyrotuikUCB Pharma, Oakville, Ontario, Canada.
Saeed ShaikhDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and the impact on patients' productivity, pain, and fatigue, in Canadian practice.

methodsFαsT-CAN, a 2-year prospective, observational study, evaluated CZP use in Canadian adults with moderate to severe, active RA. The primary objective was to assess the proportion of patients achieving 28-joint Disease Activity Scores (DAS28) <2.6 at Week 104. Secondary and additional endpoints assessed the improvements in Patients' Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the proportion of patients achieving minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in HAQ-DI. Validated arthritis-specific Work Productivity Surveys (WPS-RA) assessed the RA-associated impact on productivity. Incidence of CZP-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was reported for patients receiving ⩾1 dose of CZP (safety set).

resultsThe full analysis set (baseline DAS28 ⩾ 2.6, ⩾1 dose of CZP and ⩾1 valid post-baseline DAS28 measurement) included 451 of the 546 patients recruited into the study; a total of 229/451 (50.8%) patients completed Week 104. At Week 104, 90/451 (20.0%) patients achieved DAS28 < 2.6. Rapid improvements in disease activity, pain, and fatigue were observed. At Week 104, 66.2% of patients achieved HAQ-DI MCID. Patients employed at Week 104, reported reduced absenteeism, and improved productivity. CZP-related TEAEs were consistent with the known CZP safety profile.

conclusionsCZP was an effective RA treatment in Canadian practice, and no new CZP-related safety signals were identified. The improvements in household and workplace productivity are the first observations in a real-world Canadian setting.

Indexed as

biologiccertolizumab pegoleffectivenessrheumatoid arthritissafety

Identifiers

PMID30858896
PMCPMC6402066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.