Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30858836›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

Genomes of Neutrophilic Sulfur-Oxidizing Chemolithoautotrophs Representing 9 Proteobacterial Species From 8 Genera.

Tomohiro Watanabe, Hisaya Kojima, Kazuhiro Umezawa, Chiaki Hori, Taichi E Takasuka, Yukako Kato, Manabu Fukui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. DiverseApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. ONature communications · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomohiro WatanabeInstitute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hisaya KojimaInstitute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Kazuhiro UmezawaInstitute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Chiaki HoriResearch Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Taichi E TakasukaResearch Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Yukako KatoInstitute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Manabu FukuiInstitute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even in the current era of metagenomics, the interpretation of nucleotide sequence data is primarily dependent on knowledge obtained from a limited number of microbes isolated in pure culture. Thus, it is of fundamental importance to expand the variety of strains available in pure culture, to make reliable connections between physiological characteristics and genomic information. In this study, two sulfur oxidizers that potentially represent two novel species were isolated and characterized. They were subjected to whole-genome sequencing together with 7 neutrophilic and chemolithoautotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. The genes for sulfur oxidation in the obtained genomes were identified and compared with those of isolated sulfur oxidizers in the classes

Indexed as

comparative genomicsSterolibacteriaceae‘Sulfuricellaceae’sulfur-oxidizing bacteriaThiobacillaceae

Identifiers

PMID30858836
PMCPMC6397845
OpenAlexW2915106348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.