Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30858721›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental gastroenterology2019

Benign biliary strictures: prevalence, impact, and management strategies.

Michael Xiang Ma, Vanoo Jayasekeran, Andre K Chong

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnostic Approach to Biliary Strictures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael Xiang MaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Perth, WA 6150, Australia, michael.ma@health.wa.gov.au.
Vanoo JayasekeranDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Perth, WA 6150, Australia, michael.ma@health.wa.gov.au.
Andre K ChongDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Perth, WA 6150, Australia, michael.ma@health.wa.gov.au.
Fiona Stanley Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benign biliary strictures (BBSs) may form from chronic inflammatory pancreaticobiliary pathologies, postoperative bile-duct injury, or at biliary anastomoses following liver transplantation. Treatment aims to relieve symptoms of biliary obstruction, maintain long-term drainage, and preserve liver function. Endoscopic therapy, including stricture dilatation and stenting, is effective in most cases and the first-line treatment of BBS. Radiological and surgical therapies are reserved for patients whose strictures are refractory to endoscopic interventions. Response to treatment is dependent upon the technique and accessories used, as well as stricture etiology. In this review, we discuss the various BBS etiologies and their management strategies.

Indexed as

benign biliary stricturechronic pancreatitisendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyliver transplantationmetal stentplastic stentprimary sclerosing cholangitisstricture dilatation

Identifiers

PMID30858721
PMCPMC6385742
OpenAlexW2911509193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.