ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2019
Perception of trunk inclination during sitting with feet in contact with the floor.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic applications and therapeutic option of Cascade CRISPR/Cas in the modulation of miRNA in diverse cancers: promises and obstacles.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To clarify the sitting postural control, the influences of several reference sitting positions on the perception of the trunk position while sitting with the feet in contact with the floor and keeping the eyes closed were investigated. [Participants and Methods] Fifteen young healthy volunteers participated in the present study. The perception of the trunk position was evaluated by calculating the absolute error (error magnitude) and constant error (error direction) between the reference trunk position (which the subjects memorized; the reference position) and the position that they adopted when reproducing the reference position (the reproduced position). Eight reference positions were set at 5° increments (from 15° backward inclination [-] to 20° forward inclination [+]). [Results] The reference positions had a significant effect on the absolute error, and the absolute error values at -15° and -10° were significantly smaller than at 20°. However, the reference positions had no effect on the constant error. [Conclusion] The present study revealed that the perception of the trunk position while sitting with the feet in contact with the floor is better when inclining backward than when inclining forward. The perception of the trunk position may be higher in a low-stability position and lower in a high-stability position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.