Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30858512›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

A halotolerant growth promoting rhizobacteria triggers induced systemic resistance in plants and defends against fungal infection.

Sandeep Sharma, Chen Chen, Sudhir Navathe, Ramesh Chand, Shree P Pandey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Microbiome Analysis Reveals Biocontrol ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Identification and Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sandeep SharmaCSIR-Central Salt & Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Bhavnagar, India. sksbhu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1087-6252
Chen ChenJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics of the Ministry of Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Sudhir NavatheDepartment of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8040-5563
Ramesh ChandDepartment of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Shree P PandeyDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Banaras Hindu University · INCentral Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute · INMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DEYangzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A halotolerant rhizobacteria, Klebsiella species (referred to MBE02), was identified that had a growth stimulation effect on peanut. To gain mechanistic insights into how molecular components were reprogrammed during the interaction of MBE02 and peanut roots, we performed deep RNA-sequencing. In total, 1260 genes were differentially expressed: 979 genes were up-regulated, whereas 281 were down-regulated by MBE02 treatment as compared to uninoculated controls. A large component of the differentially regulated genes were related to phytohormone signalling. This included activation of a significant proportion of genes involved in jasmonic acid, ethylene and pathogen-defense signalling, which indicated a role of MBE02 in modulating plant immunity. In vivo and in vitro pathogenesis assays demonstrated that MBE02 treatment indeed provide fitness benefits to peanut against Aspergillus infection under controlled as well as field environment. Further, MBE02 directly reduced the growth of a wide range of fungal pathogens including Aspergillus. We also identified possible molecular components involved in rhizobacteria-mediated plant protection. Our results show the potential of MBE02 as a biocontrol agent in preventing infection against several fungal phytopathogens.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArachisCyclopentanesDisease ResistanceEthylenesFungiGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene Expression Regulation, PlantKlebsiellaMycosesOxylipinsPlant DiseasesPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant RootsRNA-SeqSignal TransductionCyclopentanesethyleneEthylenesjasmonic acidOxylipinsPlant Growth Regulators

Identifiers

PMID30858512
PMCPMC6411892
OpenAlexW2921719421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.