Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30858474›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2019

Umbilical cord blood versus mesenchymal stem cells for inflammation-induced preterm brain injury in fetal sheep.

Madison C B Paton, Beth J Allison, Michael C Fahey, Jingang Li, Amy E Sutherland, Yen Pham, Ilias Nitsos, Robert J Bischof, Timothy J Moss, Graeme R Polglase and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Madison C B PatonThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Beth J AllisonThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Michael C FaheyThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Jingang LiThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Amy E SutherlandThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Yen PhamThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Ilias NitsosThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Robert J BischofThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Timothy J MossThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Graeme R PolglaseThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Graham JenkinThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Suzanne L Miller *The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia. suzie.miller@monash.edu.
Courtney A McDonald *The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Hudson Institute of Medical Research · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChorioamnionitis and fetal inflammation are principal causes of neuropathology detected after birth, particularly in very preterm infants. Preclinical studies show that umbilical cord blood (UCB) cells are neuroprotective, but it is uncertain if allogeneic UCB cells are a feasible early intervention for preterm infants. In contrast, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are more readily accessible and show strong anti-inflammatory benefits. We aimed to compare the neuroprotective benefits of UCB versus MSCs in a large animal model of inflammation-induced preterm brain injury. We hypothesized that MSCs would afford greater neuroprotection.

methodsChronically instrumented fetal sheep at 0.65 gestation received intravenous lipopolysaccharide (150 ng; 055:B5, n = 8) over 3 consecutive days; or saline for controls (n = 8). Cell-treated animals received 10

resultsLipopolysaccharide induced neuroinflammation and apoptosis, and reduced the number of mature oligodendrocytes. MSCs reduced astrogliosis, but UCB did not have the same effect. UCB significantly decreased cerebral apoptosis and protected mature myelinating oligodendrocytes, but MSCs did not.

conclusionUCB appears to better protect white matter development in the preterm brain in response to inflammation-induced brain injury in fetal sheep.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornApoptosisAstrocytesBrain InjuriesCell DeathDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFetal BloodGliosisHumansInflammationLeukocytes, MononuclearLipopolysaccharidesMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsLipopolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID30858474
OpenAlexW2922223928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.